Friday, 2 March 2012

Tyres dumped, Stockport Rd, Denton


The council will not have to pick up the bill for this illegal fly tipping as it is just about on land owned by United Utilities. The vermin responsible obviously planned ahead while looking for a site to dump these tyres. Nobody would have given a second glance at a van reversed into this entrance to the water treatments works. As the criminals unloaded the tyres they would have been shielded from passing cars by the back doors. Now they have gotten away with it once, no doubt they will use this same spot to dump more in the future.

If you ever find yourself passing the water treatment works always take a look over at the entrance just in case on the off chance you catch them at it again.

It must be frustrating to be a legitimate tyre disposal business when you are competing against unscrupulous criminals who will be able to undercut you every time because unlike you, they do not have to pay for the tyres to go to landfill or recycling, they just look for a quiet spot like this where they can dump and scarper.

Tyre disposal is big business and when the criminal scum responsible for crimes like this outgrow roadside dumping they usually rent a yard and then collect tens of thousands of tyres for disposal, but before legitimate disposal ever takes place a fire, accidentally on purpose 'mysteriously' starts and all the tyres go up in smoke. The crooks then abandon the site and leave someone else to pick up the bill.

57 comments:

Anonymous said...

Let United Utils clear the tyres up on their land seeing that they have been top partners with TMBC who stuffed £27 Million into the hands of United Utils behind the scenes via a back street Company of 3 in Salford set up to receive the £27 millions.

Anonymous said...

Anon 01:07

What utter rubbish. Justify your outlandish claims.

Peter Richards Labour Scumbag said...

While Labour Magistrate, Cllr Brian Wild, sneaks around Dukinfield posting SMEAR leaflets about the BNP.
He runs scared of the growing evidence that his party is a party of child molesters.

Private Eye said...

The allegations made by anon@01.07 are very serious. Can any proof of these claims be presented?

Roy K West said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

She pays Weekly Personal Care Single £430 - £460

To be left lying on the fucking floor.

Aluman said...

ROY why dont you two lazy f--kers look after her your selfs

Anonymous said...

To the Anons who obviously are thick and ignorant of the Labour sleazy antics over the years,do not whatsoever doubt my facts on this site.
I am not justifying my postings to the Labour goons on my searches and fact findings over years but here`s a taster of what my thousands of documents I hold state.Ask Gwynne whether my facts are not 100% correct,he well knows my abilities and findings which he knows are 100% accurate,just ask him,or better still ask him to face me in a public forum debate where I would unload the facts which he knows I have.
For 3 months almost every day I cross examuned at the Kingswater/Waterside public inquiry
which led to the massive scheme being rejected especially when the land within the scheme was United Utils and TMBC who passed the scheme had invested £27 million into United Utils like I disclosed at the PI.
Sir Philip Mawer (House of Commons
Investigator of Complaints) will tell you all about his investigations I requested into Gwynne and BRENDA Warrington when he found I was 100%correct about their House of Commons antics in the HofC vital registers where
they had the audacity and did not disclose the facts in the Declaration of Interests files which I located and exposed.
Ask Quinn,Taylor etc whether Gwynne was banned from taking part in Council Meetings when he was a Counciller.
As for top Tamesides Councillors
not registering their interest,ask Mr.Greenwood Ex TMBC Chief Executive why he had allowed this situation to persist until I trawled the files at TMBC head office and found such alarming "facts".of years of ignored declarions by leading Councillors.
Of course you obviously don`t know that R.Oldham had had large security installations at his house which he had "borrowed" from TMBC which he had never paid for.
My confirmed files and numerous press released facts I hold are more than accurate, they depict
how this rotten Council has been sleazy throughout years.
As for the Mottram ByPass I cross-examined each day it was held and
established without doubt the ficticious and seriously flawed evidence was a gross misreprentation of the facts,and so ended that Public Inquiry because I could prove as always data and confirmed facts I had located.
Just give me your actual names Anons and lets see if you are in my files,and don`t forget to ask MP Gwynne whether I ever release incorrect facts,that`s why he declared he would no longer represent me,correspond with me,or answer my communications,and thats fact as well.
Being a constant stickler for the truth and always obtaining substantiated and confirmed documentation do not attempt to accuse me of rubbish.
I look forward to your names if you have the bottle and I would be happy to seek any information worth knowing.
J.Hall.
If you want more sleaze reports I would be spending too much of my time addressing ANONS who talk through their lower orifices,and who hide their names.
"Lets have names" if you want your postings to be other than a load of crap.
Although I don`t know you Mr.West
but thanks for your warnings,but be assured I continue to seek important confirming documentation regardless.

Anonymous said...

Aluman don't make those kind of comments when yo don't know what you are talking about.
Ther's a good lad.

Jewboy said...

Mr Hall, was Gwynne a councillor or an MP when he refused to represent you. If he used those exact words you could get him into bother.

Anonymous said...

I thought it was the nutter Hall that was posting his rubbish again. I hear there was a meeting recently to get the Mottram bypass going again at long last.

vote labour said...

LABOUR PARTY!
Ann Holland: Verbal Abuse
Mark Burton: Sexually Abusing Children
Narraser Gordon: Deceiving
Eric Joyce MP - Fighting in the commons
Hassan Ahmed: Conflicting Interests
John Holden: Benefit fraud
Darren Pedley: Child Porn
John Friary: Child Grooming
Milan Radulovic: Benefit Fraud
Shelina Akhtar: Benefit Fraud
John Friary – Child Abuse
Frank McGrath Drugs and Money Laundering
Keith Potts Child Porn
Joe Shaw Child Pornography
Maqbool Hussein vote rigging
LIARSBUGGERSANDTHIEVES.BLOGSPOT.COM

Anonymous said...

Mr Hall is churning over the same old rubbish.

Ronnie Rabbit

Anonymous said...

Ronnie Rabbit tosser from Boyds Walk.

Anonymous said...

Nope my warren is not at Boyd's Walk

Ronnie Rabbit

Aluman said...

I dont see how anyone could let someone else look after a close family member ? whats up with you people ? and do we pay for it laddy

Anonymous said...

I agree Aluman. We should look after our own. Shame on West.

Anonymous said...

Aluman I told you not to make comments when you don't know what you are talking about.
One thing I would say, you sound like a uaf/Taylor clone.
Did not see you in Hyde at the protests.
All talk and no action I guess.

Personal choice said...

I don't know the condition of Mr West's relative, hopefully she's happy and in relatively good health.
Regarding the subject of care of the elderly in general, when you look at the state of many of them, with conditions like advanced dementia, dribbling, with no memory, messing themselves and living in a mental vacuum, who would want to live like that if they were aware of it? And who would want to impose their care on their relatives if they were aware of it? Everyone, of whatever age and health status should be given the option to end their lives with dignity.

Village Idiot or Vicious Thug said...

Aluman are you sure your not with this tosser? You sound just like him.

Anonymous said...

03/03/2012 17:39

The care home in question is now under new management.
And major changes are now underway at the care home.
I'm not going to get into a rant with Aluman. I've seen him in action at meetings talk about strange people. You should meet him.
Aluman you don't pay for her, she pays for herself. And her late husband served in India in the army.

Aluman said...

Hello its a blog you spud and if you put something on here i will comment on it ? and this is what has gone wrong with this country we no longer look after our own . and so what if a family member makes a mess of there selfs ? you clean them up just like they did for you for many years ? But as for assisted suicdie that should be available.

Anonymous said...

Yes comment by all means, but you are making comments about a situation you know nothing about spud.

Aluman said...

The pay must be good in the army

Aluman said...

well dont put in on here you bell end

Roy K West said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Aluman you really are a numpty.

Aluman said...

west thats why you live in ducky coz your scared if you come down from the hills someone mite find you a job

Anonymous said...

Sorry made a bad slip there, Mean to have said her Father served in India.

Time's up said...

Everyone should be forcibly euthanised at 90. It costs an unsustainable and unjustifiable amount to keep the very elderly alive.

Anonymous said...

Says the person that wanted to stand in elections but could not read the papers. Numpty!

Blob said...

03/03/2012 18:11 Time's up said

Yeah till your time comes, you'll be over the moon and first in line I bet?

Blob said...

forcibly euthanised at 90 you mean murder people don't you? Where do you get such vile ideas? That's just vile talk.

Aluman said...

WEST you could.nt lie straight in bed

Aluman said...

and my granddad shot better than you in the war

Anonymous said...

Aluman you are a very strange person, and I actually feel sorry for you, as I also did that day at the meeting.
And by all means carry on posting your childish rants.
I'll leave you an open path to make them.

Blob said...

03/03/2012 18:11

Time's up said

Back to your comment about forcibly euthanised at 90. What if they don't want to be murdered at 90? So you want the state to go round murdering citizens when they reach the age of 90?

Aluman said...

SOMEONES TOLD YOU TO BE CAREFUL WITH ME YOU MEEN ?

Anonymous said...

Oh please no threats you numpty.

(Keep Britain Tidy) said...

Environmentalism Fly-Tipping (Keep Britain Tidy) Roy West Report: Tameside 17th Oct 2011.

Keep Stalybridge Canal Clean said...

Environmentalism Roy West Report June 2011 Welcome To "Tesco Town" Keep Stalybridge Canal Clean.

Stalybridge Canal Litter Problem said...

Environmentalism Roy West Report Stalybridge Canal Litter Problem 14October 2011.

Anonymous said...

People should put their rubbish in the bins provided.

Tameside Citizen said...

What a totally obscene comment by ‘Time’s Up’. Was it Pete Townsend who once said he didn’t want to live to be old? Well he is old now and I bet he wouldn’t fancy being asked to kneel down while he receives a .22 round to the back of the scull to put him out of his misery.

I imagine Time’s Up would feel pretty much the same way if he or she was a healthy and happy go-lucky 89 year old dreading their next birthday when time’s up for them.

Yet more amazing revelations from Mr Hall. Keep on exposing the wrongdoers Mr Hall. It is great people like you who help keep the political brigands in check.

Anonymous said...

Has Townsend's book come out yet?

I reckon a fair few parents of his 'research subjects' would be more than happy to pull the trigger.

SerpentSlayer said...

I personally wouldn't like to live to 90, but if you want to then so be it. Personally I think, where possible the children should look after their elderly relatives, unfortunately it doesn't always work like that.

My mother works with elderly people living in sheltered accomodation, I hear stories constantly of sons or daughters who never visit. The usual reason is that they 'have their own lives', often at the other end of this boil in the German ocean.

If we are looking for people to euthenise, surely it should be people with no regard for their family and in particular their mother and father.

That leaves it up to the state to look after the elderly, I can't see why it shouldn't. The buggers tax your money at every transaction, the leats they can do is look after you whe you are done filling their coffers.

Irene Woodcock said...

Shame on Roy West for allowing an elderly relative to be abandoned in an institution. Bring her in to your home and look after her if you really care you mean spirited so and so.

Time's up said...

'What if they don't want to be murdered.' Murder is done for selfish and gratuitous purposes, culling of an overlarge elderly population when they've had a very long life is done for non-selfish, rational reasons. What will happen on the current course when, in a few decades, the average life expectancy and crucially, average age, has vastly increased. The country will be bankrupt and its dynamism chronically diluted because of these two factors. The correct course is to deal with this problem now not wallow in self regarding squeamishness and avoid doing anything because it makes over emotional types 'feel bad'.

Something being unpleasant has nothing to do with whether it is correct or not.

Anonymous said...

Give it a rest you ignoramus don't comment on personal issues you no nothing about. You only show yourself up to be malicious in nature.
Don't believe for one minute it's Irene Woodcock she would not be so nasty.
She says hello to my partner when she sees her.

Anonymous said...

04/03/2012 13:59

You are not right in the head to post such comments. No one can take you seriously anyway.

Police Bully working for the Labour Mafia said...

TC can you advertise the next Dukinfield District Assembly on the 6 March 2012
Dukinfield Town Hall 6.30pm.

It's an important meeting for me personally, standing up to the intimidation from the Police inspector from Stalybridge, he comes to my house to put pressure on me regarding ant-Labour leaflets I'm posting in Dukinfield.

Time's up said...

Anonymous 13:59, no-one can take YOU seriously, or indeed any way, because you failed to express a view or answer any of my specific points.

The first cull should be anyone with three or more criminal convictions for offences of the level of theft and above, probably a few hundred thousand people. They could be rendered down and their by-products used for something productive. Imagine how much better a place Britain would be without these creatures.

Anonymous said...

No it's because I don't agree with murder. You are insane to think, that I would agree with such vile methods you are putting forward.

Time's up said...

There is a difference between a rational, justified cull and murder.
For comparison, if we decided to expel everyone from Britain with red hair that would be irrational. If however we decided to expel everyone from Britain, if necessary by force (and something that could cause violence and a lot of unpleasantness) who had no legal right to be here that would be entirely rational. It would cause a lot of suffering to lot of people bu would be no less correct a course of action.

new anti-labour leaflet for Duki said...

Why are Labour Councillors so keen to have their picture taken with children?
Labour Councillors Child Molesters
Mark Burton: Sexually Abusing Children
Darren Pedley: Child Porn
John Friary: Child Grooming
Bob Bates: Child and Animal porn
Keith Potts: Child Porn
Joe Shaw: Jailed Child Pornography
Jonathan Phillips: Child Abuse
Stewart Brown: Child Pornography
Ben Williams: Child Pornography
George Harding: Abuse
Derek Woodvine: Child Abuse: Child Rape
Ken Brookman: Assault and Child Abuse
Martyn Locklin: Rapist
Keith Rogers: Child Abuse
Liarsbuggersandthieves.blogspot.com

Replacement Migration said...

The loon who wants to 'cull' the elderly to deal with the issue of an ageing poplulation need not worry. By 2035 Britain will have one of Europe's youngest population thanks to the immigration boom. The majority of Britons of the future will be brown not white, but at least they will young, that will make the lefty who wants to cull the elderly happy.

Time's up said...

I'm not a leftie. If you'd bothered to read my previous comment you'd have seen I specififcally referred to immigration, which is a separate but related problem regarding population density and what that population consists of.
If it increasingly consists of foreigners, as the demographic timebomb you refer to says it may do, Britain will become 'something else' and lose its essence. For those who belive all cultures and races are equivalent that is desirable, for a rationalist like myself who knows that is a total fallacy it is something to be prevented at all costs.