Saturday, 11 April 2015

The Election is here. UKIP/Tory pact?

Yes, I know it's a cliche but it's the most infamous example of "My enemy's enemy is my friend" I can think of.

In Tameside there are rumours of a UKIP / Tory pact based on the fact that five Tory candidates will not face a UKIP challenger ( Ashton Hurst, Hyde Werneth, Stalybridge South, Longdendale and Denton West.). Four UKIP candidates will not face Tory rivals (Hyde Newton, Droylsden East, Audenshaw and Dukinfield Stalybridge.) The perceptive ones amongst you will note that the first two wards were traditionally good wards for the BNP, gaining 1000 votes in Droylsden East the last time a BNP candidate fought it.

Needless to say the Labour Party and those not knowledgeable of Tameside politics are making a great fuss about this "pact", claiming that it shows there is no difference between the two parties. The truth is simpler. As any thinking person in the borough would tell you. ANY political pact, agreement or campaign is justified to free Tameside from Labour control.

It is madness, sheer madness, to split the anti-Labour vote and thus facilitate the return of any Labour Councillor when they could be thrown onto the dung heap of history where they belong.

It is regretable that if there is a pact, it was not carried out in all wards .

To continue on other election issues, I expect that UKIP will receive the denounciations from the pulpit once reserved for the BNP. It appears that there has been at least one already, though not reported in the press. The clergy seem to have got a taste for this sort of political intervention and one is reminded of the old axiom "When they came for.........I did not protest because I was not a ........."  "When they came for me there was no one left to protest."

The pulpit seems to be aimed at increasingly mainstream targets. The old saying can now be written as "When they tried to come for me there was no one left to come, they were too busy chasing everyone else!"

I will watch with interest whether there is a denounciation of the only Communist Party candidate (In Audenshaw). The anti-religious credentials of the CP are more obvious and bloody than UKIP so even-handedness and fairness should mean a denounciation is forthcoming. But...."even-handed and fair...." not terms one associates with the Democratic Centralism of Marxist politics


Labour, the Muslim Party. said...

The 'pact' wards will send a shiver down Labour mafia spines (if they had any). Quinn et al will be bricking it as Labour have always relied on the opposition vote being split.
The Conservatives and UKIP should be using the same tactics nationwide in every ward and parliamentary constituency.

Tameside Citizen said...

In complete agreement with you. It is a pity that there are a few wards in Tameside with no 'pact'.

Anonymous said...


Tory /UKIP pact is the best of both worlds.

Solid fiscal and monetary policy delivered by the Conservatives, in conjunction with a solid anti immigration and active repartition policy by UKIP.

Coming out of the EU many advantages including getting rid of these ridiculous human rights and employment laws, which finds me having to pay women who get pregnant and cannot work … a ridiculous piece of legislation which, IMHO makes women not worth employing (unless of course they are over 50 ).

I for one cannot wait for the Con/UKIP coalition, if only to cut the welfare budget which is buckling under the weight of people who seem to think a bit of “depression “stops them operating a brush or a mop !.

Yours sincerely,

The New Statesman

Tameside Citizen said...

I am impressed "New Statesman", four postings in 17 minutes, you certainly practice what you preach regarding hard work etc. But I am puzzled by the adverse comments on the human rights laws. The Deputy Leader of Tameside council shares an equally jaundiced view of this legislation, are you a Labour suporter?

SerpentSlayer said...

I am in unfortunately not in any of these wards, though I will vote UKIP if I am able and vote Tory if not. It leaves an ill taste to vote Conservative, given what that party and it's leader and chancellor have done, but I know the local party had no hand in it.
If only the Torys had more to do with their historical namesakes, supported the king over the water and would throw out the false queen who allows international financiers to use the nation as a personal piggy bank.

Anonymous said...


In regard to the so called human rights laws, they are a labour invention to keep unsavoury foreign born criminals from being deported.

I suspect that those Bollinger Bolshevik's who run the Labour party , know for well that those who's come in to this country and settle are more likely to vote labour, which is why they hide behind human rights laws and mutter such utterances as 'right to a family life'etc.

My views are clear on this, if you are a foreigner and are found guilty of an offence both you and your family will be deported.

This kind of action, in conjunction with a press campaign should focus a few minds and save the country money in the long run.

I would of course bring back hanging and hard labour, the former being a real deterrent, as the dead are unlikely offend again!

Human rights laws suck the very life out of a country ,allowing criminals and foreign types to play the system ,leaving mugs like ourselves to foot the bill.

Yours sincerely,

The New Statesman 

Better a 'racist' than a traitor said...

10,000 Africans trying to get into Europe picked up from the Mediterranean in the last FOUR DAYS.
Millions more queueing up all along the North African coast as the effects of decades of the, foreign funded, African population explosion and their, virtually all self inflicted, economic and social implosion take hold.
The main parties have, and will, do NOTHING about this devastating and destructive time bomb heading OUR WAY.
Vote UKIP.

Paedo Janner criticised justice system for excusing alleged Nazi war criminal who had dementia said...

Lord Janner, the Labour peer who escaped charges over alleged child sex abuse because he suffers from dementia had in the past criticised the justice system for excusing a suspected Nazi war criminal for the same reason.

Greville Janner has criticised the Old Bailey jury system for allowing an 86-year-old man to escape being questioned in 1997 over Nazi atrocities that had taken place in 1941 and 1942.

Szymon Serafinowicz, a retired carpenter from Surrey, was arrested in 1995 as the first British person under the War Crimes Act in connection with murders of three Jewish people during the Second World War.

He had denied the allegations but could not answer questions and put forth his case during a trial due to having dementia.

Lord Janner, a former Leicester MP and chairman of the Holocaust Educational Trust had said: “I am sorry that he was not tried while he was fit enough to stand. War criminals have managed to evade prosecution under our system of justice for decades.

“There were absolutely no reasons why he should have escaped charges for ever.”

“I don’t care what bloody age they are,” he said in 2012, according to The Jewish Chronicle. “These criminals should have been dealt with years ago.”

Lord Janner, who is also 86-years-old, was excused by the Crown Prosecution Service from being questioned over “some of the most serious sexual crimes imaginable” due to the “severity” of his dementia.

He would have been charged with 14 indecent assaults on a male under 16 between 1969 and 1988; two indecent assaults between 1984 and 1988; four counts of buggery of a male under 16 between 1972 and 1987; and two counts of buggery between 1977 and 1988.

Another vile Labour pervert. I have been telling people about this monster for years after hearing first hand from one of his victims. He is our very own version of Lavrenty Beria

Heil Hitler said...

Today is the F├╝hrer's birthday, happy birthday Adolf. Today is also the day when back in 1968 Enoch Powell gave his prophetic Rivers of Blood speech. If only the sheep had listened to those two great visionary Europeans.

Anonymous said...

Janner – The inside track...

Janner a gay man would have had a lot of difficulty getting his 'needs' met bearing in mind that, homosexuality was illegal up to 1967 when Janner was 39 years old.

So he finds other ways of getting his 'needs' met, by abusing children.

The authorities find out , but instead of prosecuting him , they groom him to be a friend of Israel , just when Israel was becoming a nuclear power.

After all we need to know what our friends the Americans are up to …..

So Janner gets in involved in all sorts of Holocaust, initiatives , which of course will get him in the circle of those Israeli and American influence makers.

The reports back to his MI6 Handlers.

All goes ok then , times change the internet connects people and those who were abused realise that they were one of many.

The establishment get the proceedings drooped a couple of times, but with Saville's antics , the public have a thirst for nailing paedophiles, so Janner is investigated again.

This time Janner is screwed , as it looks like it will come to court , so conveniently he is 'coached' in how give the signs of Dementia, , which of course is done by a set of question and answers not xrays or blood tests.

Bet you Janner would squeal like a pig , implicating the security services and a few other of his high profile friends, to cut a deal .

I bet Rolf Harris is kicking himself........

Race. To the finish. said...

In August 2010 Libya's former leader Colonel Gaddafi visited Italy to try and secure money for continuing to control and prevent African migration into Europe and spoke about the African migration situation:
"Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European, and even black, as there are millions of Africans who want to come in.
We don't know what will happen, what will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans.
We don't know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions."
Less than twelve months later Gaddafi was deposed with western assistance. Libya is now a lawless hellhole and sub-saharan Africans flood through virtually unopposed.
Think carefully how you vote on May 7th as it absolutely clear the existing political establishment has neither the stomach or the will to do anything about this endless deluge of unwanted foreign hordes, many of whom are violent and hostile to us, our culture and way of life.

SerpentSlayer said...

Getting a confession from Janner wouldn't be hard, not if the interrogators were well trained in the art.
Someone like that will be full of reasons to justify what they did, desperate to convince people that they did it for perfectly human reasons. Give them a chance to tell the story themselves and they will, especially if you make them think that telling the story themselves will do them some good.
More on it here:
Whether you find yourself asking the questions or being asked them, it's important to know hoe its down, and interesting.

Not all human life is sacred. said...

A gang of homosexual paedophlies were convicted yesterday. They had committed some of the vilest acts imaginable against babies.
Anyone saying these beasts SHOULDN'T be executed should explain why and suggest a possible appropriate alternative punishment that reflects the extremity of their appalling crimes. Ignore anyone saying life imprisonment is adequate, that 'argument' is based entirely on the personal squeamishness of the selfish liberals whose priority is 'feeling good about themselves' not trivia like the punishment fitting the crime and the value of a GENUINE deterrent for such depraved acts.
Meanwhile the degenerates disguised as 'educators' continue to press for the sexualisation, brainwashing and corruption of children just started at primary school by feeding them warped, perverted dogma about transgenderism et al.
ANYONE trying to forge the non-existent connection between innocent children and sexuality should be viewed with the profoundest suspicion and watchfulness.

Reimer said...

A perfect cleric for such a brave new city -

Migrants: Britain has 'moral duty' to help, says bishop of Manchester


Reimer said...

"Anyone saying these beasts SHOULDN'T be executed should explain why"

IMO capital punishment should be for murder. I hesitate to extend it to lowlife such as these vile child-abusing creatures, not to feel good about myself, but out of concern for "mission creep".

All academic for the foreseeable future anyway - too many have insufficient appetite for the restoration of a tradition-based socially conservative regime.


Sequel to Dawn of the Planet of the Apes filmed in Baltimore said...

Here's the trailer

Anonymous said...

Race is connected to the violent crime rate.
The moon is made of cheese.

One of the above is false.

SerpentSlayer said...

Personally I think murder is a far lesser crime than sexually abusing pre-pubescents. I've known people who were abused as children and many of them are plagued by it the rest of their lives, unable to have a healthy relationship in the future and therefore unable to have a normal life.
Not only that but it can never be remotely justified, killing another man, even in cold blood can be sometimes.

Not all human life is sacred. said...

Reimer, what do you suggest as an alternative punishment for baby rapists.