Thursday, 15 November 2012

Police and Crime Commissioner elections today: Will you be voting?

I certainly won't. In my opinion it is nothing other than a blatant and absolute waste of public money and a totally pointless exercise.


Hang, flog, scourge, burn in hell said...

An expensive sop to try and con a few gullible cretins that the main parties care about PUNISHING CRIMINALS. They don't, which is why I won't be bothering to vote.

SerpentSlayer said...

I normally encourage people to vote whenever they can in the case of this I see it as a forerunner to privatisation of the police, an independent commissioner will be able to preside over contracts, accept bribes and all the other trappings of public office.

I certainly will not be voting, I encourage all others to abstain.

Tameside Council 14th Of November 2012 said...


Give me a lizard or spider any day said...

How dare you give such an insult to lizards and spiders.

Anonymous said...

Reading the TC blog over past years why does the penny never drop that the Masonic Mafia are at the heart of Politics,Law,Local Government,Labour and Tory parties,Police,Press,Media
in fact all the links you complain about.
I posted last week these same threats
which were totally ignored,so whilst TC subscribers can`t see the truth in the UK and in their Tameside midst comments which are simply slapping at the corruptness we all know,its time the penny dropped who and what these groups,panels,bodies of administration are controlling every instance of your complaints.
Get into the real facts of corrupt,vile acts,and financial manipulations and local issues become incidental because of who controls your welfare and lives.
Quasi Masonic links are everywhere protecting criminals,business,politics and molesters everywhere start allowing the penny to drop else you are tinkering with nothing.
Read what I was referring to last week yet only now in the press

Anonymous said...

eoLucy Powell (Lab) 11,507
Marc Ramsbottom (LD) 1,571
Matthew Sephton (C) 754
Chris Cassidy (UKIP) 749
Tom Dylan (Green) 652
Eddy O'Sullivan (BNP) 492
Loz Kaye (Pirate) 308
Alex Davidson (TUSC) 220
Catherine Higgins (Respect) 182
Howling Laud Hope (Loony) 78
Lee Holmes (People's Dem) 71
Peter Clifford (Comm Lge) 64

Lab maj 9,936

Labour hold Manchester Central

The Home Affairs Committee has agreed to the following Report:—FREEMASONRY IN PUBLIC LIFE said...

27. Over the years, freemasons have faced allegations that there has been undue masonic influence in some local councils, either involving elected members or officers. It was partly in response to such allegations that Grand Lodge established with the Local Government Ombudsman the system whereby Grand Lodge would, following representations from the Ombudsman that particular individuals were under investigation, identify whether they were or were not freemasons.[35] We are aware of two cases where the Local Government Ombudsman had admonished councillors in respect of failures to declare membership of freemasonry in connection with planning applications.[36]

(a) Pembrokeshire County Council

28. We agreed to pursue limited inquiries in respect of one council. This was the Pembrokeshire County Council, which first met in 'shadow' form, following local government reorganisation in Wales, in May 1995.[37] The Council had been drawn to our attention as raising concern because of the number of councillors, in particular members in the majority group, who appeared to be masons.

29. Pembrokeshire County Council decided at its first meeting to establish a public Register of clubs, societies, associations and similar bodies to which its members belonged. Most but not all councillors submitted a return. As at June 1998, the position was that there were 40 independent councillors (from amongst whom all the Committee Chairmen and Vice-chairmen were drawn), with 11 Labour, 4 Plaid Cymru, 4 Liberal Democrat councillors and one vacancy. All but four of these had, or have since, submitted a return, with all the non-returners being independents; the Chairman of the Committee wrote to the four councillors who had not submitted a declaration, inviting them to inform the Committee - in confidence - whether or not they were masons.[38] The resulting overall information indicated one declared current mason amongst the non-independents, and 16 (41%) current or former masons among the 39 independents for whom information was available. A similar proportion of official positions—such as Committee chairmanships—were held by masons. No one masonic Lodge appeared to have more than three council members.

30. Thus around two-fifths of the majority group on the Council were masons or former masons; the proportion could be higher than this, since councillors were not asked to state whether they were former masons (although some have indicated that they were). This is a substantial proportion, and can easily give rise to concerns that improper influences can be brought to bear on council work.

Anonymous said...

Electric went off for an hour today (power cut) Just goes to show how much we have come to rely on the power.

Not worth fighting for said...

So over 20 Labour voters in Manchester Central for each lonely solitary BNP voter, this in a city that has bore the brunt of multiculturalism over the last several decades. Even if you factor out the non-white and pink vote, no-one could seriously consider that the ratio might look any less damning.

How long before the average shirt&tie BNP rosette warrior finally wakes up and acknowledges that the cause for white survival in Great Britain is dead & burried. Anyone who seriously believes it is worth trudging the streets campaigning for such paltry returns is in need of major intrusive brain surgery.

Face facts - the chink of light which shone briefly in the early 2000s for the nationalist movement was nothing other than the last gasp of a movement whose real chance came and went in the 1970s. In the broad scheme of things nature will ensure a minority of us survive in various regions on this planet, the rest will quite deservedly perish.

Black Tide said...

The wards of Manchester Central constituency are: Moston, Ancoats, Clayton, Ardwick, Bradford, City Centre, Hulme, Moss Side, Miles Platting, Newton Heath and Whalley Range. Bearing that in mind, it's not exactly a surprise Labour won by a mile despite the appallingly low turnout. By the time of the next election they will no doubt try to get their 'new' British vote in these formerly English areas out in force. As 85% of non-White Commonwealth immigrants vote Labour I predict a landslide.
Interestingly this constituency has the 2nd highest unemployment rate in the country, 15% (only beaten by Ladywood in Birmingham at let me think why that might be).
If Manchester Central follows national trends a conservative estimate for youth unemployment is 40%.
Perhaps the most salient point re Tameside is that the Boundary Commission's plans to redraw this ward will draw in Droylsden West. The words, coming this way spring to mind.

Morte ad democratia said...

The average Labour voter is thick, liberal or a leftie. The average Labour voter in this constituency is just thick.

Here Was A Man said...


BBC’s Ministry of Climate Propaganda Exposed said...

BBC’s Ministry of Climate Propaganda Exposed as Secret Panel of “Experts” is Revealed

In scientific circles, the exact causes of climate change are heavily debated, but if you listened to the mainstream media you would be led to believe that they were all in agreement, and all believed that climate change was entirely man made and carbon based.
Most of these mainstream sources also believe that a global carbon tax is a good solution, no surprise there.
Recently information has come to light that may explain why mainstream media sources have this sort of one sided view on the issue.
In the case of the BBC they got all of their information from a panel of apparent scientific experts, whose identities were kept secret for years.
Now their identifies have been revealed and it seems that not only was the panel one sided, but it was also filled with mostly government, corporate, and media types who have an obvious stake in how the issue is presented.
Many of the actual scientists listed as being involved were exposed as frauds in the Climategate scandal that broke a few years ago.
According to an online article:
“Last month Guido reported that the BBC were refusing to respond to a Freedom of Information request asking for the names of scientists who attended the now infamous climate change seminar in 2006, that was convened to decide BBC climate change policy.
The BBC Trust admitted that the evidence given at the seminar led to an unprecedented editorial decision to no longer give equal airtime to opponents of the climate change .
At the time Guido wondered why the BBC was spending a six-figure sum to keep the names of the specialists who dictated their editorial policy secret? So who was there?
Well if the BBC had their way we would never know, they are still trying to fight the publication of this list, however what is believed to be the complete who’s who has now been acquired by legitimate sleuthing by Maurizio Morabito.”

The names on the list are as follows:

Robert May, Oxford University and Imperial College London
Mike Hulme, Director, Tyndall Centre, UEA
Blake Lee-Harwood, Head of Campaigns, Greenpeace
Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen
Michael Bravo, Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge
Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant
Trevor Evans, US Embassy
Colin Challen MP, Chair, All Party Group on Climate Change
Anuradha Vittachi, Director,
Andrew Simms, Policy Director, New Economics Foundation
Claire Foster, Church of England
Saleemul Huq, IIED
Poshendra Satyal Pravat, Open University
Li Moxuan, Climate campaigner, Greenpeace China
Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund Ethiopia
Iain Wright, CO2 Project Manager, BP International
Ashok Sinha, Stop Climate Chaos
Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, Tearfund
Matthew Farrow, CBI
Rafael Hidalgo, TV/multimedia producer
Cheryl Campbell, Executive Director, Television for the Environment
Kevin McCullough, Director, Npower Renewables
Richard D North, Institute of Economic Affairs
Steve Widdicombe, Plymouth Marine Labs
Joe Smith, The Open University
Mark Galloway, Director, IBT
Anita Neville, E3G
Eleni Andreadis, Harvard University
Jos Wheatley, Global Environment Assets Team, DFID
Tessa Tennant, Chair, AsRia

Continued said...

BBC attendees:

Jana Bennett, Director of Television
Sacha Baveystock, Executive Producer, Science
Helen Boaden, Director of News
Andrew Lane, Manager, Weather, TV News
Anne Gilchrist, Executive Editor Indies & Events, CBBC
Dominic Vallely, Executive Editor, Entertainment
Eleanor Moran, Development Executive, Drama Commissioning
Elizabeth McKay, Project Executive, Education
Emma Swain, Commissioning Editor, Specialist Factual
Fergal Keane, (Chair), Foreign Affairs Correspondent
Fran Unsworth, Head of Newsgathering
George Entwistle, Head of TV Current Affairs
Glenwyn Benson, Controller, Factual TV
John Lynch, Creative Director, Specialist Factual
Jon Plowman, Head of Comedy
Jon Williams, TV Editor Newsgathering
Karen O’Connor, Editor, This World, Current Affairs
Catriona McKenzie, Tightrope Pictures
Liz Molyneux, Editorial Executive, Factual Commissioning
Matt Morris, Head of News, Radio Five Live
Neil Nightingale, Head of Natural History Unit
Paul Brannan, Deputy Head of News Interactive
Peter Horrocks, Head of Television News
Peter Rippon, Duty Editor, World at One/PM/The World this Weekend
Phil Harding, Director, English Networks & Nations
Steve Mitchell, Head Of Radio News
Sue Inglish, Head Of Political Programmes
Frances Weil, Editor of News Special Events

That same article goes on to tie some names on this list to the Climategate scandal saying that:
“What the Beeb will be most embarrassed by is the representative from the disgraced Climatic Research Unit who were exposed three years later for manipulating data to fit their arguments.
Emails from Mike Hulme, second on that list, were at the heart of the Climategate scandal.”
Since the Climategate broke in November of 2009 the carbon based global warming theory has lost support and is now under extreme public scrutiny.
Despite the mainstream media and political circles insisting that their theory is fact, more and more people are starting to question the details of the carbon theory and rejecting the idea of carbon taxing.
While all of this discussion and controversy is taking place over this very specific theory there are a host of other environmental issues that are being ignored.
Our energy resources are being poorly mismanaged by the organizations that control them. These governments and corporations are destroying the planet and placing the blame on us so they can justify making us foot the bill.
Sinister applications of genetic engineering are creating new species that pose an unprecedented threat to our ecosystem.
Toxic radiation and pollution has become commonplace in our everyday environment, mostly due to corporate carelessness and military exercises.
There are very serious environmental issues that we need to correct, but it’s not limited to one chemical compound and we aren’t going to solve anything by taxing the average consumer.
Additionally, as by far the worst polluters on the planet, governments have no right to attempt to control the actions of others under the guise of environmental protection

Progress said...

Properly controlled and directed genetic engineering is essential in the quest for progress.

Anonymous said...

It's places like Uppermill and the like, that all the whites have ran to live. tirnalu