Tuesday 16 December 2014

Ashton Jobcentre Sanction pregnant woman for telling the truth.

A 19 year old pregnant woman has been sanctioned by Ashton Jobcentre for telling the truth! When she was interviewed by B&Q for an unpaid placement she told them she was pregnant. B&Q originally stated she would therefore be given light duties but they later changed their minds and told the Jobcentre they would not require her. Accordingly the Jobcentre sanctioned her. FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. This is the same Jobcentre which employs G4S security guards who threaten claimants.  For further details see:- here 
also :-here and :-here 

We can't claim a "scoop" since other blogs have beaten us to this story but we are mentioning it because it deserves a wider circulation. Visit the other blogs which have covered this story.


20 comments:

Alf Garnett said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Welfare witches are exempt from most of the benefits purges.
1)Get pregnant.
2)Get Housing Association flat (more likely house with garden - bumping British working people even further down the list behind immigrants etc).
3)Vote Labour.

Alf Garnett said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alf Garnett said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
SerpentSlayer said...

I feel that what happened to this young woman is merely the tip of the proverbial ice berg. Not content with selling off public institutions and depriving others of funding, continuing with the funding of quangos and increasingly undoing a thousand years of English laws meant to protect our freedoms from bureaucrats, tyrants and foreign enemies, the Conservative Liberal coalition is ensuring that a young generation competing for jobs with the rest of the world and with a larger than ever number of worker on this island (but not necessarily OF this island) is deprived of the safety net enjoyed for so long by the people of this country.
We could argue that the child's father should pay or that the young woman should "get a job" (the fact that she was willing to do unpaid work to retain benefits suggests she was willing to work, but could not get any) but ultimately the failings of our society and the deliberate ruin of our economy is not her fault or the fault of any normal Britisher.
It is the fault of those who see the world as a giant shopping mall, where human beings are mere financial commodities and any surplus can be hounded to poverty, homelessness and starvation.

All patriotic Britons should stand up for those persecuted by the state because they cannot find work in a globalised marketplace. For if we are to see ourselves as British, we have to recognise that we are part of a nation of people, and as a people we must look out for our own against those who wish to cannibalise our resources, cower our people into submission and ultimately destroy us.
We cannot play into the Tory nonsense of "tax paying" being the mark of the worthy citizen, or of looking down on those British folk who cannot find work. We must look out for each other!

Anonymous said...

With mechanical reliability, along come the trusty old worker breeder drones who see virtue in whoring oneself at the alter of capitalism. Just the kind the well endowed middle classes love to service their profit making machinery. Better to be a scrounger than a willing and ignorant wage slave.

Anonymous said...

Internationalist exploiters and the horrors of mass immigration aside there is such a thing as an indigenous parasite. Being one is absolutely nothing to be proud of.

Anonymous said...

Wage labour is slavery in all but name. The parasites are the rich and wealthy, whether their obedient little gerbils running forever in the wheel of capitalism understand or not.

Anonymous said...

There is more than one type of parasite whether bone idle leeches understand that or not

Anonymous said...

Yes, and there's more than one kind of insufferable person than just so-called 'parasites'. Sanctimonious, self-righteous, holier than thou prigs spring to mind.

Anonymous said...

There are people who talk about capitalist parasites etc, yet who are happy not only parasitising others but also boasting about it. Don't expect those supporting such behaviour by their labours, to be happy about it.
There's nothing self-righteous about stating the plain truth and pointing out the flaws in an argument. Unless
the person opposing can demonstrate using reasoned argument why they are right.

Anonymous said...

" Don't expect those supporting such behaviour by their labours"

The amount of tax paid by minimum wage slaves toward unemployment benefits is tiny. JSA only accounts for a tiny fraction of the welfare budget, the bulk going on state pensions and housing benefit.

What's more, unemployment benefits are MEANS TESTED, in order to claim them you have to prove that you're poor. They are in effect an insurance policy for society's poorest workers to ensure that when capitalism tosses them on to the scrap heap, workhouses and begging bowls don't suffice giving rise to the prospect of red revolution where the real parasites lose their heads.

Anyone calling themselves working class who moans more about benefit claimants than they do leeching owners (and there're plenty of them) are traitors to their class, fact.

Anonymous said...

The relative proportions of welfare spending are irrelevant to the 'fact' that anyone who wilfully lives off the labours of others is a parasite.
No-one moaned more about benefit claimants than leeching owners, the statement was that there was more than one type of parasite.
Anyone who calls themselves working class but wilfully doesn't work is a hypocrite and a traitor to those that do.

Anonymous said...

Relative proportions of tax paid by workers to welfare received are totally irrelevant to the principle that a parasite is someone who willingly lives off the labours of others. Fact.
No-one 'moaned more about' benefit claimants than exploitative employers but pointed out that there is more than one type of parasite.

Anonymous said...

Contrary to what the hard done by middle classes and their compliant little whores in the working class would have us all believe, the issue is not one of tax payers versus benefit claimants. It is in fact an issue of the rich versus the poor.

Social security exists as a safety net for the poor, not the rich. The only people whose view counts where benefits are concerned are low paid workers, those who receive the scraps and crumbs of capitalism. And anyone in their number who makes any kind of song and dance about benefit claimants has his priorities seriously ****** up, and most certainly is a whore for capitalism and a traitor to his class. And being a 'scrounger' is preferable to being a whore and a traitor.

Anonymous said...

Abuse demonstrates an inability to construct a reasoned, valid counter argument.
That wealthy parasites exist is as certain as the fact that there are parasites on benefits leeching off low paid workers. Social security is a safety net for those in need not a lifestyle choice for the wilfully lazy who are traitors to the TRUE working class.

Anonymous said...

A low paid worker has far more of his labour leeched off by the wealthy than his does by so called benefit scroungers.

He also understands that those in his class intent on singing from the same hymn sheet as middle class Tories like Iain Duncan Smith help provide ammunition for evil snipes at the poor and vulnerable like the bedroom tax.

Incidentally, I don't believe for one minute that any sanctimonious moraliser here griping about benefits are themselves low paid. And by low paid, I'm talking min. wage or similar for the privilege of earning just enough to line the pockets of some leeching landlord or to live on some sink estate. Anyone in that position with their head screwed on right has at least some sympathy for the benefit lifestyle, considering that deal many get in work.

My concern is seeing spare room taxes replaced by spare home taxes, and making sure work pays enough to be a worthwhile endeavour for all. That's the problem with the average native Brit - when his country is in its death throes he still finds the time and energy to whinge about relatively trifling matters like who is claiming what, where and when. He didn't fight the real fight that ought to be fought, he instead grumbled his way to grave.

Anonymous said...

Endorsing wilful benefits parasites and simultaneously condemning wealthier versions is illogical and unsustainable.
No-one has endorsed Iain Duncan Smith just pointed out that ALL those deliberately living off the backs of others are by nature parasites.
I have as much 'sympathy for the benefits lifestyle' (whatever that is) as those choosing to live that lifestyle have with the working people who support them - none. The difference is the latter don't live off the former.
Long term benefits abuse does no-one any good, it simply destroys will and character.
Work at least provides self-discipline, skills, purpose and self respect and is, in the modern day reality of increasingly widespread poor pay and conditions, the least worst option.
I would advise working somewhere (as I do) with a strong union presence to help curb the worst excesses of potentially exploitative employers. It's certainly better - for yourself and others - than parasitising workers and doing nothing.
Or perhaps the millions of decent working men and women are simply the brainless lackeys that patronising, one dimensional sophisticates say they are.

Anonymous said...

Endorsing wilful benefits parasites and simultaneously condemning wealthier versions is illogical and unsustainable.
No-one has endorsed Iain Duncan Smith just pointed out that ALL those deliberately living off the backs of others are by nature parasites.
I have as much 'sympathy for the benefits lifestyle' (whatever that is) as those choosing to live that lifestyle have with the working people who support them - none. The difference is the latter don't live off the former.
Long term benefits abuse does no-one any good, it simply destroys will and character.
Work at least provides self-discipline, skills, purpose and self respect and is, in the modern day reality of increasingly widespread poor pay and conditions, the least worst option.
I would advise working somewhere (as I do) with a strong union presence to help curb the worst excesses of potentially exploitative employers. It's certainly better - for yourself and others - than parasitising workers and doing nothing.
Or perhaps the millions of decent working men and women are simply the brainless lackeys that patronising, one dimensional sophisticates say they are.

Anonymous said...

Some employers are greedy tossers, some aren't. Just like some people on benefits - the ones looking for work - are OK, and some - lazy bleeders/lazy bleeders posing as class warriors, aren't.