Dear Borough Solicitor
I am absolutely disgusted that I like thousands of the Denton Electorate have received Labour Posters delivered to my home which state: "Please display this Poster in your window" which states: Say No To Police Cuts, Re-Elect Brenda Warrington
The message implies that Police Cuts will be or have been arranged in Tameside Greater Manchester whereas the facts are that an increase in Police Officers (approx 14) has been allocated. This is manipulated terminology intended to indicate especially to thousands of the Elderly and vulnerable an element of "Fear" by implying a reduction in Tameside Police Officers.
As the Borough Solicitor I believe this breaches the required conduct of all those Councillors and MP`s depicted on this Poster leaflet, and you should act accordingly and publicly condemn the intended poster as being deliberately misleading with the intention of creating Fear in the Tameside Electorate in an effort to secure votes for Labour.
I trust you will observe your need for objective impartiality in your role as monitoring officer for TMBC, and ensure full clarification is immediately offered to the Electorate.
In conclusion I requested last week that the Tameside Advertiser should permit my letter to be published which would expose this intended fear tactic in order to gain Labour Votes.
Yours faithfully
John Hall
Having received no response the following correspondence was sent
Dear Ms Stewart
Because the May Elections are imminent, I would like to know what your intentions are concerning the deliberately misleading Poster Leaflet distributed on behalf of Councillor B.Warrington which I notified to you Weds 13th April 2011
Any response delay on this issue, or refusal to address this situation will have ramifications for any declared result which occurs. Because I will vigorously pursue this serious Election incident.
I would suggest that you immediately ensure all such Posters displayed in any residential window or any other form of public display in the Denton area represented by Councillor Brenda Warrington be removed urgently, with a public statement made by yourself condemning such an intentional misleading campaign leaflet.
Yours sincerely
John Hall
I do not currently have access to the offending leaflet in question but I suspect it will be similar to the Labour leaflet pictured above (click to enlarge) which is currently being distributed in Dukinfield. Dukinfield and Denton of course are in the same parliamentary constituency so there is a strong likelihood that this leaflet is very similar to the one Mr Hall complains of. The Conservatives are also putting out an excellent leaflet exposing the Labour scaremongering campaign regarding fictitious police cuts. Tameside Citizen
73 comments:
Just of interest concerning Standards of those in Public Office its interesting reading the list of TMBC investigative Standards Committee members
The chair of the Standards Committee is Mrs Valerie Bracken who ? (background???.)The other members of the committee are:
Mrs Jacqueline Barnes, who???
Mr David Berry (background ??)
Mr R Pannone (background ???)
Councillor Melanie Anderson (Mossley Town Council Representative - required under the relevant regulations)
Councillor Valerie Carter (Mossley Town Council Representative - required under the relevant regulations)
Reverend Dennis Thomas (Background ???)
Councillor Joe Kitchen, Chair of Council Business, and nominated substitute Councillor Susan Quinn
Councillor John Bell, Leader of the Opposition, and nominated substitute Councillor Derek Baines
Note one of the most influential and powerful Top Masons in the UK our Rev D.Thomas does not indicate his incredible illustrious Freemason titles,and his role over TMBC Police.
Also note Mr R.Pannone one of the most senior Lawyers in Greater Manchester is simply Mr.Pannone with no mention of the huge family Legal business of Pannone etc.
These all decide whether your complaint is of value and valid.
As for the rest who knows who elected them,and have any of those also got "interests"we should be told their backgrounds if they are to deliberate on complaints you might make.
www.uk-human-rights.org/misconduct.htm
J.Hall Denton
Do not despair about the Governments intended scrapping of Standards Committees reducing your ability to lodge a complaint,you can use
www.uk-human-rights.org/misconduct.htm
which overide anything Politicians scrap or dream up.
John - I wouldn't hold your breath!
Good information. Did you know there is an on going Masonic plot to subvert and control the Catholic church. That is the reason we are constantly bombarded with scandals involving paedophile priests. While there is no doubt the celibacy rule enforced upon Catholic priests can lead certain priests to behave in a deviant manner their numbers are miniscule when compared to the number of good and devoted priests who only ever do good.
The Masonic controlled media have hammered home Catholic priests = paedophiles for decades now and the masses, as ever have fallen for it hook, line and sinker. The very few cases of sexual abuse within the church and spanning many decades which do get discovered always gets prime time news saturation whereas by comparison the utterly depraved paedophiles from the main UK political parties who rarely get a mention other than in local press.
The Masons are aware that many of their hirelings on the political scene are real sexual deviants but they deliberately prevent the sheeple from seeing the true extent of their behaviour whereas every isolated case related to the Catholic church is reported as if it is a true epidemic.
Simple but effective mind control!
Mr Hall, I doubt if Ms Stewart will bother replying. She hasn't responded to my Email on a question of electoral law. And I'm a candidate.
G J Shorrock
(Nowt To Do With Me Guv Response:)
So it now becomes a formal complaint to the Electoral Commission.Funny how the Tameside Advertiser didnt want to tell Tamesiders about the misleading references to Cuts in Police.
Dear Mr Hall,
Thank you for your email making a complaint about alleged election malpractice received on Wednesday 13/04/2011 at 20:27hrs. As I have previously advised you it is not possible for me to respond instantly to your concerns particularly whilst I am engaged in managing the election process. I apologise if this causes you undue distress or inconvenience.
Please note neither the Council, nor the Returning Officer have authority or jurisdiction to investigate or make determinations as to the validity or legality of election material. This is a matter for the Police and/or courts in determining either criminal offences or electoral malpractice.
However, I can assure you this is not electoral malpractice but normal electioneering, where one political party sets out its policies and/or criticises another parties.
It is not for the Returning Officer or his staff to become involved in making statements or observations on any election material.
Campaign publicity material is subject to a number of restrictions under electoral law, and is also subject to the general civil and criminal law relating to published material. For example, no campaign publicity material may resemble a poll card. The restrictions and offences in relation to political leafleting are set out in the electoral commission guidance to Candidates and Agents which I have set out in the box below and attach. The High Court’s ruling in the Phil Woolas case gives clarity on the legal position as to what is banned. As the ruling says, “There is in our judgment a very significant difference between a statement that goes to the political conduct of a candidate and one that goes beyond it and says something personal about his personal character … Freedom of political debate must allow for the fact that statements are made which attack the political character of a candidate”.
Clearly, it is a matter for the electorate to decide and chose between the candidates and their policies when placing their vote.
Some newspapers run stories during the election and feature some or all candidates. While the allocation of broadcasting time is prescribed in legislation, the way that newspapers communicate their views on political issues is not. Newspapers may take whatever view they like on the candidates at the election and may include as much or as little coverage as they decide. Clearly, the Council has no influence or jurisdiction in relation to local newspapers and what they print as they are wholly independent of the Council.
I realise you will remain unhappy with this response, and therefore would strongly recommend that you seek the advice of the Electoral Commision, the independent body set up by the UK Parliament to ensure integrity and public confidence in the democratic process who can be contacted via their website at: http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/contact or by phone on (020) 7271 0500. In relation to your complaint about the advertiser you may complain to the Press Complaints Commission at: http://pcc.org.uk/contact/index.html
If you are unhappy about the way the Council and in particular the way I have dealt with your complaint you may seek the advice and assistance of the Local Government Ombudsman who can be contacted through http://www.lgo.org.uk/making-a-complaint/
Yours sincerely
Sandra Stewart
Borough Solicitor
Is the TIBARD Co of Dukinfield
(Directors: The Shonfield Family)
linked to Mr J.Taylor TMBC Deputy
I pose the question in our Democratic Society,anyone know ??
Att:TMBC Borough Solicitor
Ms Sandra Stewart
Dear Ms Stewart
I am seeking your considered opinion concerning the TMBC Standards Committee its formation,its powers,and its responsibilities towards the Tameside Electorate seeing it is not an elected assembly
or held to account by any other form of other administration.
To assist your thoughts I have denoted certain aspects of legistlation applicable to TMBC in the persuit of the Common Law Rights associated with Misconduct in Public Office.
It would appear that direct conflicts of association and interests exist between members of the TMBC Standards Committee and members of the TMBC Administration which could create a lack of impartiality
and therefore a possible unjust,unfair or incorrect determination resulting should a complaint be investigated by the Standards Commmittee under its present format.
It is within my Rights as a member of the Tameside Electorate that I raise this matter and I am seeking a full and comprehensive response from yourself as the Borough Solicitor on what I believe is a serious issue.
Now based on Official Legistlation according to the High Courts it needs to be clarified whether the TMBC Standards Committee is a fit group of individuals to administraste the Common Law associated with Misconduct in Public Office seeing that its members have a direct conflict of association with those acting in Public Office positions within TMBC.
Now these are my considered opinions and the Tameside Electorate need to know their rights which should NOT BE USURPED BY ANY STANDARDS COMMITTEE chosen by TMBC itself.
J.Hall Denton
Response on Part 2
(Part 2 Cont)
Mr Hall
Thank you for your email.
I have read your complaint but I am unclear as to what it is you are asking or seeking.
The Standards Committee is set up in accordance with legislation and is currently overseen by the Standards for England, the national regulator. You can read more about the regulator at http://www.standardsforengland.gov.uk/
In particular I would refer you to: http://www.standardsforengland.gov.uk/Guidance/Thelocalstandardsframework/ which sets out the legal framework for Standards Committees and their constitution.
You can also read about the work of the Tameside Committee and how it has been formed through the Standard Committee papers which can be found at http://public.tameside.gov.uk/forms/CommitteeDocs.asp
I should be grateful if you could clarify your concern.
I relation to passing your queries, complaints and requests for information to other officers – it is appropriate that I refer or delegate matters as expedient either because they have more knowledge of the matter, or as with some Freedom of Information requests, I am the statutory officer who deals with appeals, so I do not in those circumstances deal with the matter at first instance. I trust this clarifies the position.
If you remain dissatisfied with this response or the way your concern has been dealt with you may contact the Local Government Ombudsman for advice and assistance who can be contacted through http://www.lgo.org.uk/making-a-complaint/ or the Standards for England at: http://www.standardsforengland.gov.uk/aboutus/Contactus/
Yours sincerely
Sandra Stewart
Borough Solicitor
(Strange that the Borough Solicitor does not refer to the Standards Board for England which has been scrapped by the present Government)
Just ignore John Hall. He is a well known trouble causer. He likes to moan just for the sake of moaning.
I can't believe some people on this blog actually believe the whole Freemason Conspiracy stuff.
B Warrington said...
Just ignore John Hall. He is a well known trouble causer. He likes to moan just for the sake of moaning.
.....................................
Should that be the notorious TMBC Councillor Brenda Warrington spouting off who denied to Our Historic House of Commons Official Registry of Intertests,that "SHE HAD NO INTERESTS TO DECLARE" which showed on the Anderew Gwynne MP House of Commons Interests site.
Its a good job "I found you out" Councillor Warrington knowing you were a well paid TMBC Councilloor and also had 3 Outside Declarable Interests which should have been declared,in fact your mate Andrew Gwynne MP was still a TMBC Councillor at that time and obviously was fully aware therefore that your Hof C declaration was totally FALSE, being neighbours and close comrades on TMBC
So having contacted Sir Philip Mawer the House of Commons Coducts Supremo
he investigated you and Andrew Gwynne MP and found I was 100% correct and both were reprimanded (thats all) for duping the House of Commons Registers,and a warning was sent to all Members to ensure they did not usurp House of Commons laws like you did.
So B Warrington if its you our Councillor who does not even live in the Denton West Area leave off with your comments seeing we are on two vastly completely seperate levels concerning openness,probity and accountability,compared with being bottom of the barrel.
Lets continue investigating your antics like creating fear in the Electorate to gain votes,now that indicates bottom of the barrel antics who must have considerable experience experience of knowing the types required to be a Councillor.
When we last met in a Public Meeting
I mentioned your confirmed false records in the House of Commons and you immediately threatened to close the meeting and storm off,such nice types we have,its time you were dumped back where you belong.
You also remained hiding in seclusion as to your role in the Tameside Hospital administration when the bubble burst on the shoddy treatment which caused deaths.
So continue to spout and run Councillor you will not run fast enough to escape what I know.
J.Hall Denton
Lets see what the Government Ministers and The UK Electoral Commission think of your intention to strike FEAR INTO THE ELECTORATE OF DENTON AS HAS ALSO OCCURED IN DUKINFIELD WITH THE SAME ANTICS TRIED BY J.TAYLOR
All to gain votes,what`s it like at the bottom of the Election Barrel
Councillors,may I suggest stinking,murky and underhanded would be appropriate.
J.Hall Denton
Well done Mr Hall, I back you all the way.
Dear Mr Hall
When I battled for the greatest team in the world. I gave my all for the cause.
Keep that spirit alive in your cause.
Everyone feared playing us, because we were hard but fair.
You can take the spirit of our team into your own battle.
We were more than, just a football team.
A member of the nobility caught using tax payers money to fund a foreign trip to a family wedding.
The country is broke and has been for decades, in order to maintain the quiescence of the middle class and thus political stability wages and goods need to be forced down by any means necessary.Immigration and off shoring to any extent required.
Halt the gravy train.
Stop this man claiming back £50,000 in the last two years. Plus his £9,000.
Seven Asian coward attackers - one white female victim - definately not a racist attack.
Greater Manchester Police don't give a s*** about white folk........
The freemasons shouldn't be underestimated. They founded the United States, the finest instrument of materialist capitalism and a safe haven for international finance parasites.
Before anyone writes it off as a nonsense conspiracy theory they should consider why it is brought up with such frequency. Forces are working to destabilise and destroy civilisation and have been for millenia, the curtain call isnt near off.
Oldham will be totally (and I mean totally) Islamic within 30 years.
It will Oldhamistan - but only if we allow it to happen. Our forefathers secured this country for us, and we owe a debt of duty to those who come after us to make sure Britain does not fall on our watch.
Street-level crime and ASB in February 2011.
Street-level crime and ASB in February 2011
Oldham is heading for Islamic takeover as are many other areas. The Islamic population of Britain increased ten times faster than any other group between 2004-2008, according to the last government's own (very cautious) figures.
The British people are infested with parasites, scum, thickos, cowards, self seekers, human plankton obsessed with trivia and those who don't WANT the truth. There are still enough good people left to save Britain but they need to act very soon if our nation and its identity is to survive.
Hall. why don't you grow some balls and take your case to the election court.
Oh, I forgot. Its easier to whine on here than actually do something
Tell us what you've done dickless.
We Britons are endlessly propagandised, by owned publications of the cheap-labour lobby, about how immigration is supposedly good for the British economy, It is worth reviewing, for the 38,399the time, why this is fantasy economics. To wit:
a. Immigrants increase our aggregate GNP, simply because more people working means more output. But this is not a valid measure of economic health. India has a larger aggregate GNP than Switzerland, but is a much poorer country, because it's per capita GNP that determines
a country's wealth. Technically, we could expand our aggregate GNP by annexing Bangladesh or Zambia! (Sound familiar? This is a lot of what the Empire was about, which is why ordinary Britons didn't get anything out of it.)
b. Immigrants reduce our per-capita GNP, by reducing the average skill level and capitalisation of the workforce. Skills and capital are what make a workforce productive, and thus well-paid. For one, they are mostly cheap labour, with low-quality skills, so they produce less, per capita, than the existing labour force, diluting the average. For two, they cause the finite capital stock of the economy to be divided among more people, diluting our capitalisation.
c. Immigrants retard technological progress, by encouraging the substitution of cheap labour for technology. What, for example, do you think is behind the re-appearance of (highly inefficient) manual cash-washes? Anyone who's been to a country like Japan, where cheap foreign labour is almost unknown, and technology fills the gap, will know that whole swathes of the British economy are ridiculously backward in this respect.
d. Immigrants reduce our real GNP by causing inflation, principally in housing prices, but also in other things. So the real standard of living of Britons is lowered.
e. Immigrants cause social costs, for everything from unemployment to policing to schools to council housing, which they do not pay enough in taxes to pay for. The employers of cheap labour are, in effect, extracting a subsidy from the taxpayer, because they don't bear these costs.
f. Truly exceptional immigrants, like talented inventors and industrialists, who might add something to the economy that wouldn't otherwise be there, may indeed exist. But they are exceedingly rare, their value does not exceed the cost of letting all the other immigrants in, and such people will probably succeed anywhere they go, so we need not feel sorry for them.
3. This bulletin has observed before that the relentless assaults on American-model capitalism coming out of Venezuela portend something large. If the USA is no longer strong enough to enforce its economic will in its own back garden, its ability to enforce its preferred economic model on the entire world is clearly in doubt. While capitalism as such is here to stay, the current neoliberal variety thereof may not survive a serious economic crisis, or a determined effort to displace it. It is in this context that we note the amusing exchange of insults, at a conference of New World heads of state in Argentina, between President Chavez of Venezuela and President Vincente Fox of Mexico, who is still determined to follow the American model. The former called the latter a ‘puppy of empire’, an insult severe enough to cause Mexico and Venezuela to recall their respective ambassadors. The occasion was an unsuccessful attempt to negotiate an expansion of free trade in the New World. (By the way, the FTAA, or Free Trade Area of the Americas, is a project similar to the old European Economic Community.
It is an economic Trojan horse concealing a long-term agenda of merging the USA and Canada with the chaotic and primitive banana republics to its south.) The source article was originally at Mexico, Venezuela Recall Envoys as Spat Intensifies (Update1) - Bloomberg
4. What will replace the neoliberal model? This bulletin has maintained for some time that, despite establishment claims that it is in trouble, the economy of Japan, the most nationalist major nation on earth, is in fact doing very well, and should be looked to for clues as to what sensible economic nationalism consists of. We are pleased to see that the truth has apparently become to hard to hide between the cranes on the Tokyo skyline, and the mainstream press is now admitting that Japan is prospering: How long before people start drawing the obvious conclusion: laissez faire is a mistake, and economic nationalism is the wave of the future? There is a good review of how profoundly Japan repudiates laissez-faire here:
paecon.net
An electrician faces the sack for displaying a small palm cross on the dashboard of his company van.
Former soldier Colin Atkinson has been summoned to a disciplinary hearing by the giant housing association where he has been employed for 15 years because he refuses to remove the symbol.
Mr Atkinson, a regular worshipper at church, said: ‘The treatment of Christians in this country is becoming diabolical...but I will stand up for my faith.’
Throughout his time at work, he has had an 8in-long cross made from woven palm leaves attached to the dashboard shelf below his windscreen without receiving a single complaint. But his bosses at publicly funded Wakefield and District Housing (WDH) in West Yorkshire – the fifth-biggest housing organisation in England – have demanded he remove the cross on the grounds it may offend people or suggest the organisation is Christian.
Mr Atkinson’s union representative said he faces a full disciplinary hearing next month for gross misconduct, which could result in dismissal.
The association strongly promotes ‘inclusive’ policies and allows employees to wear religious symbols at work.
It has provided stalls at gay pride events, held ‘diversity days’ for travellers, and hosted a gender reassignment event entitled A World That Includes Transpeople. continued
unfortunately Halls letter is based on his usual poor research skills. Any idiot can read what the chief constable is saying. Just in case Halls research skills dont stretch that far, one of the many examples is here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-11757760
I love my heritage, and the cause of greatness.
A message for Mr Hall and his associates on this web blog.
As Borough Solicitor for Tameside MBC, I am not responsible for the content of election communication distributed by political parties throughout Tameside.
The material on the leaflet that you refered to earlier is neither illegal nor misleading, and I resent the implication that my refusal to intervene in the matter somehow constitutes a lack of impartiality. Your attempts to undermine my authority are becoming increasingly vexatious and I am minded to refer the matter to the police.
Regards
Sandra Stewart
The Borough Solicitor won't bite the hand that feeds her.......ok?
To the Borough Solicitor.
Firstly the leaflet you refer to is in fact 50% a detachable Poster for Window Displays in Denton and Dukinfield by the thousands who received them,and those seeking election votes have requested that the recipients of the Posters should display THE POSTER and promoting the Labour Candidates with say NO TO POLICE CUTS.(full stop)
Now misleading is certainly an serious issue as I hope the Electoral Commission will now be considering because the reality is that Tameside is Not Down for Police Cuts as implied on the POSTER by not clarifying Tameside is not intended to have Police Cuts, because in reality in Tameside. "Police Increases"are planned.
Any potential candidate anywhere whether standing for election in Cardiff,Preston,Crewe etc could equally suggest to their intended Constituents Vote For Me,if YOU don`t want to see the numbers of GP`s and Consultants Cut (where London was facing possible Cuts)but not "their voting public)or Vote for Me if you don`t want to see "Cuts in
Buses" (where Birmingham was facing intended cuts)but the locality where the Candidates were canvassing.
Council Elections are held so the locality concerned can have their local objectives achieved,not whether Birmingham or London should not have cuts.
Therefore to imply because Manchester was not mentioned in the intended WINDOW DISPLAY POSTER and the restricted terminology did not clarify it was Manchester facing Police Cuts not Tameside.
As for openly threatening me
Ms Stewart with Police Action,because I make perfectly valid points to denote the need at all times in Tameside for all Employees of TMBC who administrate our daily lives should ensure impartiality,openness,
accountability,probity and all human rights be applied in every single instance to the 220,000 Electorate.
How you have interpreted my communications with yourself should be open to very serious perusal because"Your Authority" as you stated, should always be openly available to public scrutiny at all times as is the Prime Ministers Authority be open to scrutiny by the media,the public and other politicians.
Please be aware Ms Stewart I do not take personal threats lightly
simply because I have sought to uphold the right to receive information,challenge any decisions made,or remind those administrating our lives of the perpetual need to comply with all.
If you are complaining of my reminders to "all those" within TMBC for the need to implement all rights and legistlation issues due to the Tameside Electorate,we Tamesiders have those rights without threats of Police Action.
Should you proceed with your public threats to me on the Internet,may I simply explain that my really vast documentation files regarding TMBC would certainly serve me well.
Should you wish to apologise for direct threats on the Internet,I would accept such feed back with
understanding for at 75 years old
Ms Stewart I do not fear your suggested threats.
To any other TC subscriber who prefers to remain Anonymous and
ridicule my efforts to offer facts,
be my guest because I am not someone intending to shut the shop.
on TMBC
J.Hall Denton
To Ms Stewart Borough Solicitor
Because I noted your suggestion that I should contact the Electoral Commission because of the issue not being one which comes under your jurisdiction,I welcomed your kind suggestion and followed your advice.
Regards
J.Hall
The threats indicated which seemingly originate from the Borough Solicitor Sandra Stewart are the ramblings of a severely rattled being who is wandering the byways of Tameside.
Ms Stewart informs me direct that the comments are false,ficticious and should not be associated with her.
All these seeking to stifle credible facts are obviously trying every trick which formulates in their demented minds
John Hall Denton
Why did Sandra Stewart ask the police to stand down over their investigation of Andrew Doubleday?
There are a lot of pissed off people who have previous experience of the Zimbabwean standard of elections in Tameside. The goings on in Hyde Newton two years ago being a prime example. The real winners of that gutter by-election were the hard left agitators who magically appeared en masse out of nowhere and enabled Labour to win. Some Labour councillors are in bed with these agitators and have openly admitted as much.
Greedy Bastards......
west & hall are the to worst trouble casers in tameide
Stalybridge & Hyde MP, Jonathan Reynold's Parliamenary Assistant, Mike Kane has been interviewed by the police for making offensive comments towards another councillor.
Anyone will know what a nasty piece of work this devious little shit is when having dealings with him in the past. He has room to talk to call anyone with the appearance and stature of Gollum from Lord of the Rings.
Worth reading
TAMESIDE POLICE NUMBERS TO BE INCREASED
Posted on March 14, 2011 by tamesidetories
BOROUGH WAS UNDERMANNED DURING LABOUR’S YEARS OF GOVERNMENT
The number of police officers for Tameside is to be increased from April onwards, after it was revealed that the borough has been undermanned for several years – thanks to the last Labour Government.
From the 1st April, an extra 15 police officers are to patrol Tameside’s streets following an audit of police numbers across Greater Manchester, which revealed that not enough police officers had been stationed in Tameside after 13 years of Labour Government.
Tameside Conservatives welcome the additional officers to Tameside, and look forward to the increased efforts to reduce the high crime figures.
The two worst trouble makers? Someone's got to do it. Imagine what the Tameside Labour mafia would get up to if NO-ONE bothered to monitor or challenge them.
Join the Great Voices around the world (speaking the truth)
A message for Mr Hall and his associates on this web blog.
As Borough Solicitor for Tameside MBC, I am not responsible for the content of election communication distributed by political parties throughout Tameside.
The material on the leaflet that you refered to earlier is neither illegal nor misleading, and I resent the implication that my refusal to intervene in the matter somehow constitutes a lack of impartiality. Your attempts to undermine my authority are becoming increasingly vexatious and I am minded to refer the matter to the police.
Regards
Sandra Stewart
To The TC Administrator:
I must assume that the Borough Solicitor has not requested that the blog attributed to her be removed.
May I add that the terminology utilised on now both these two blogs showing on the TC site, is in my opinion someone who has some knowledge of how to impersonate a Solicitor,or briefed on the use of the wording required to impersonate a Solicitor.
Whichever applies if I was the Borough Solicitor I would be quickly seeking confirmation that these two dubious blogs are immediately removed.
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c.23) (RIP or RIPA) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, regulating the powers of public bodies to carry out surveillance and investigation, and covering the interception of communications. It was introduced to take account of technological change such as the growth of the Internet and strong encryption.
RIPA can be invoked by government officials specified in the Act on the grounds of national security, and for the purposes of detecting crime, preventing disorder, public safety, protecting public health, or in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom.
The Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 9 February 2000 and completed its Parliamentary passage on 26 July.
Although RIPA originally listed public authorities such as local councils for some kinds of covert surveillance, in September 2003 Home Secretary David Blunkett announced additions to the list of those entitled to access certain types of communications data collected under RIPA in what civil rights and privacy campaigners dubbed a "snoopers' charter". Following a public consultation and Parliamentary debate, however, Parliament approved the new additions in December 2003, April 2005, July 2006 and February 2010.[
Muslim Poppy Burner gets a £50 fine for burning poppies on Armistice Day to insult all our war dead yet a white Christian who burned a Koran to protest the 9/11 Muslim massacre of 3000 innocents in America gets jail sentence.
There truly is no lengths the appeasing criminals running this country will not stoop to in their bid to destroy the will of the native Brits who offer resistance to the demographic displacement of the indigenous natives of this island.
The only way that Hall and West could be called Tameside's biggest trouble makers is if "trouble makers" equalled "deluded with their own self importance"
So we now have two Borough
Solicitors in Tameside.
incredibly both named Sandra Stewart what a small world it is.
Dear Mr Hall,
Thank you for your email.
I have no idea to what you are referring, but I can assure you that I categorically do not engage in any website or blog communications whatsoever. If you have read something purporting to be from me I can assure you it is not. I would strongly recommend given you feel threatened and harassed you report the matter to the police for investigation as they will be able to trace the computer from which the message has come from.
I have explained to you that I have no jurisdiction or authority in respect of election leaflets but I have given my opinion as to their legality. I also advised you of the action you could take if you were unhappy with my response. I trust you will be following those as I do not intend to debate this matter further.
Yours sincerely,
Sandra Stewart 17 April 2011 19:03
Borough Solicitor
Contact Details:
Address: Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council, Council Offices, Wellington Road, Ashton-under-Lyne, OL6 6DL
Web address: www.tameside.gov.uk
Telephone: 0161 342 3028
Fax: 0161 342 2747
E-mail: sandra.stewart@tameside.gov.uk
PA to Borough Solicitor: Christine Handley
Part of an 'art' exhibition in Scotland last year consisted of burning bibles. Guess how many were arrested?
Saw Joan Taylor on the Grove today.
Money is at stake you see!
If there was no money involved, you would'nt see her.
Police Authority Police Officers Police Staff Total Timescale
Avon and Somerset 40 200 240 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Bedfordshire 56 29 85 2011/12 - 1 year
Cambridgeshire 3 126 129 2011/12 - 1yr
Cheshire 213 446 659 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Cleveland 230 15 245 2011/12 - 1 year
Cumbria 100 235 335 2011/12 - 1 year
Derbyshire 178 112 290 2012/13 - 2 yrs
Devon and Cornwall 700 500 1200 2014/15 - 4yrs
Dorset 103 145 248 2011/12 - 1 year
Durham 110 86 196 2010/11 - 1 yr
Dyfed Powys 350 2012/13 - 2 yrs
Essex 400 700 1100 2014/15 - 4 yrs
Gloucestershire 118 234 352 2012/13 - 2yrs
Greater Manchester 1387 1557 2944 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Gwent 200 150 350 2014/15 - 4 yrs
Hampshire 300 719 1019 2013/14 - 3 yrs
Hertfordshire 275 275 550 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Humberside 142 92 234 2011/12 - 1 year
Kent 500 1000 1500 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Lancashire 550 250 800 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Leicestershire 209 230 439 2011/12 - 1 year
Lincolnshire 70 100 170 2011/12 - 1 year
Merseyside 880 1000 1880 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Metropolitan Police 1291 1046 2337 2013/14 - 3 yrs
Norfolk 350 290 640 2011/15 - 4 yrs
North Wales 125 125 250 2011/15 - 4 yrs
North Yorkshire 200 350 550 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Northamptonshire 100 25 125 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Northumbria 318 825 1143 2011/14 - 3 yrs
Nottinghamshire 226 416 642 2011/12 - 1yr
South Wales 256 432 688 2011/15 - 4 yrs
South Yorkshire 400 700 1100 2011/15 - 4yrs
Staffordshire 228 363 591 2012/13 - 2yrs
Suffolk 100 200 300 2011/15 - 4yrs
Surrey -128 35 -93 2011/12 - 1yr
Sussex 500 550 1050 2011/15 - 4yrs
Thames Valley 256 564 820 2011/15 - 4yrs
Warwickshire 450 2011/15 - 4yrs
West Mercia 95 192 287 2011/14 - 3 yrs
West Midlands 1000 1200 2200 2014/15 - 4 yrs
West Yorkshire 500 1000 1500 2014/15 - 4 yrs
Wiltshire 300 2011/15 - 4 yrs
Total 12,581 16,514 30,195
These figures are based on research which draws from information from Police Forces and Police Authorities. Where forces have not provided a breakdown of how cuts will be split between police officer and police staff cuts, the combined police jobs cut figure has been given. City of London police force is not included
How amazing the TMBC Solicitor does not demand the 2 bogus E.Mails showing on TC in her name are removed.
Can you imaging any Legal person allowing someone to impersonate them
and does nowt about it.
Could it be she rather enjoys reading the comment because it identifies with her thoughts.
Most definately strange and highly suspicious me thinks.
So who is behind the scam ?,seems like they can impersonate anyone at liberty with no problems.
Will it be Quinn next posting,or even the Solicitor General.
Whats the IP showing ? now that would be really interesting.
Must think were all bloody idiots
Will the real Sandra Stewart please stand up.
Either she reads this blog or people who know her do, and that's a fact.
Little slap head Hague the warmonger really does my head in every time I see him on TV trying to whip up hatred against the legitimate leader of Libya.
I would love to see Hague and the other war criminals brought to justice one day for waging unjust wars of aggresion on soverign states.
I think the Sandra Stewart denial
without any action to condemn the
serious threats is a Labour organised fear threat tactic.
Those pictured on the leaflet itself
would be immune from impersonating ?
the Solicitor.
Just shows what we have at TMBC.
A PERVERT Gravy Train Rider convicted of hardcore child porn = No Jail
A former soldier convicted of burning a A book of pure evil is jailed.
Labour Councillor - Child Pornography.
Yes! I've been trying to hide all this from the people of Dukinfield.
I use smears against the BNP.
But I reckon the game is up now.
I can smear the BNP with talk of granny porn.
But I just can't go down this road.
Labour Councillor (Westlands/Worcestershire), Keith Rogers – Convicted, fined, and placed on the sex offender’s register in 2003, after downloading over 2,000 hardcore child porn photos on his computer.
Taylor/Wild/Fitzpatrick.
We smear people in local elections, that's clear to all.
But we can't talk about the thousands of young lives destroyed by OUR Labour people.
Labour Councillor (North Lincolnshire), David Spooner – Convicted and jailed for 1 year for masturbating in front of 2 young boys.
Labour Mayor (Todmordon/West Yorkshire), John Winstanley – Convicted and jailed in 1986 for rape and threats to kill. After raping and threatening to kill his terrified victim, Winstanley then ordered the woman to go on all fours before urinating on her.
Labour Party Official (North West England Regional Officer, and parliamentary adviser to the Home Office Minister responsible for crime and policing, Hazel Blears), Peter Tuffley – Convicted and jailed for 15 months and placed on the sex offenders register for 10 years in 2006, for the sexual molestation of a 13-year old boy that he had previously `groomed` on the internet. Tuffley was described as a `rising star` within the Labour Party - which is nothing to be proud of either!
Labour Councillor (Wokingham/Berkshire), Nelson Bland – Convicted on 16 counts of possession and distribution of hardcore child porn in 2004. Sentenced to community service, placed on the sex offender’s register and ordered to attend rehabilitation classes for paedophiles. Bland used his own teenage daughters computer to hoard his grotesque gallery of child abuse, which was discovered by police during a search of Bland`s home, when they arrested him in connection with the murder of a Nottingham businessman
It sits well with Fitzpatrick to smear someone in the the Community.
With stories about Hitler.
He belongs to a party with people like this.
Labour Councillor (Newton Aycliffe/Durham – In Tony Blair's Sedgefield constituency), Martyn Locklin – Convicted on 8 counts of rape and indecent assault on teenage boys in 2001, and jailed for 15 years (reduced to 12 on appeal). Locklin was a top local Party bigwig on first-name terms with Tony Blair, after escorting the PM during visits to his constituency on several occasions.
These slimy little men like Councillor Jim Fitzpatrick, using the smear tactics.
Work with criminal left-wing groups like uaf/searchlight, all the time.
They are members of the Labour Party, and in my opinion, a Child Pornography ring.
I base that opinion on the Labour convictions listed.
Not out canvassing then West? thrown in the towel already? Getting a battering in Duki?
Guess it must hurt.
No! got something coming.
Most surprised that the Tameside Tory party have not gone to town on the Labour Party Window Posters.
Does this indicate that the Political Cartel is much larger thanwe know about.
Nowt in the Advertiser (quite understandable with their entrenched Comrades sat in the Advertiser Office)
So surely this indicates the Tameside Electorate are being shown the ultimate in contempt at every turn.
Must be "Boycott the Election" surely.
You could say there is a cartel in Tameside. I have been told the Tory leader gives the Labour Mafia an easy ride because he has been promised the role of Lord Mayor if he plays ball and allows the Labour Mafia to continue their criminality un-opposed.
If Mr West 'gets a battering' so what. At least he's got the courage of his convictions to stand. Unlike you.
Anonymous got what I need today.
See you all soon on the streets of Duki.
About 10-0am on Monday I was entering Ashton near the Pig meat
factory (used to be Dixons) and opposite the small garden centre),when I saw approx 12 handy looking lads something akin to a dirty dozen, fit, aged 18-20 plus walking towards Dukinfield King Street away from Ashton with its group leader a smart office type suited up bloke with a clip-board.
Could these be an electioneering party chosen for their robust appearances I thought, or is it a community service group (but they didn`t look like a working party)
but just like a group of young blokes assisting the bloke with the clipboard and on a mission.
Could this have been a look into the future (or present)canvassing team on a trip into Dukinfield.
Just an observation out of the norm
??
Roy West's Lovely Spring/Summer Garden Dukinfield
Post a Comment