Thursday, 11 March 2010

Bloggers excluded from council's Twitter accreditation


Council's decision to provide Twitter accreditation to professional journalists is accused of removing bloggers from the democratic process

A council in the north of England has taken the unusual step of accrediting professional journalists to report from meetings using Twitter in a move that in effect bans local bloggers.

The decision by Tameside council means that local bloggers, members of the public and even their own councillors are not permitted to tweet because they are not members of the press as defined in law by the Local Government Act of 1972.

Robert Landon, the council's head of democratic services, said they had received requests from local media and had "authorised" three titles to tweet from meetings: "The council allows the use of 'twitter' during council meetings by duly accredited representatives of the press as part of its commitment to increasing involvement in the democratic process."

But the decision has angered local bloggers who want to add their voices to the coverage of local decision-makers.

One blogger, the self-styled "Guido Fawkes of Tameside", Liam Billington fell foul of the ruling when he attempted to use his iPhone from the public gallery and was ordered to leave the building.

It's fair to say the former member of the Conservative party has been a long-term thorn in the side of the council, but he feels his often light-hearted opinion pieces have a role in informing people via his blog Tameside Eye.

"OK, I am not 'on message' because I am not going to be told by a council officer what I can or can not write.

"There are some things which go on in meetings which don't get reported, there's some humourous things which happen and councillors do make mistakes.

"With the election coming up, people are becoming a lot more interested in local democracy and I think everyone should be given a fair opportunity to tweet through council meetings – it doesn't disturb the meeting at all."

Tameside isn't the first council to attempt to restrict Twitter use, in fact the Guardian's John Baron was prevented from tweeting @GdnLeeds when Leeds city council stopped people from using mobile devices this month.

However, requiring accreditation and applying different rules for the public and press is a new aspect to the accessibility debate.

Another local blogger, Nigel Barlow, who has tweeted from nearby Manchester city council @Inside theM60, described the move as "a dangerous precedent".

"It seems the council is hiding behind an act drawn up well before the age of social media to prevent the ordinary citizen journalist from covering a council meeting.

"My other big concern is that it is only very recently that MEN (Manchester Evening News) has decided to cover council meetings and, if they suddenly decide to cut back again on local council reporting, how does Tameside council decide exactly who is accredited.

"It is important that the ordinary citizen is given the choice of understanding what what is being decided in these meetings and bloggers and hyperlocal journalists can give a differing insight into the decision making process."

Billington is now considering his next move, which could see him attempting to report from the meeting using different platforms or devices as a way of getting around the ruling.

A previous experiment in conjunction with another local blog, Tameside Mafia, saw the SEO worker using a javascript feed to update the blogs.

With bloggers becoming more active, confident and tech savvy, such blunt attempts by local authorities to silence look increasingly impotent – what do you think on on this issue? The Guardian

3 comments:

tonydj said...

Remember this document? Page 50:-

www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/doc/810671.doc

This is just a continuation of Tameside's policyof censorship, especially when one realises how woefully inadequate are the official council minutes.

Nationalist said...

More attempted State control. We need a clearout in the legislature of this country and the installation of a regime that reflects common sense, public opinion and British values.

Anonymous said...

Shock, horror, the secretariat of this crypto-communist rotten borough is yet again attempting to stifle freedom of speech and discussion. The fact is they and the executive don't want to be questioned over their frequent attacks of organisational arrogance and displays of sheer utter incompetence.

Nationalist's quite right in demanding a clear out of the legislature and the installation of a regime which reflects good common sense, public opinion and the values of this nation no other.

A clear out of the council chamber here would certainly not go amiss, time for the voters to get rid of the failures and political pigmies we currently see on the Labour benches in the chamber and their replacement with people who REALLY care about local people rather than their own back pockets.