Labour are trying to intimidate and harass the BNP because of the nationwide increase in their vote, especially in Labour areas. They will employ any tactics such as using their politicized Police Force to arrest people on spurious grounds like the recent case in Liverpool where 13 BNP members were arrested and held in the cells all day for distributing a perfectly legal political leaflet. All charges were dropped a few days later. The political persecution of Mr West and the use of extreme left-wing agitators in election campaigns creates an atmosphere of tension and conflict which can result in incidents like the one in Leigh last night where an 'anti- fascist' rentamob attacked a BNP vehicle and trailer dragged out the occupants and attacked them with a clawhammer and also extebsively damaged the vehicle. One BNP member needed eleven stitches as a result and several of the thugs were arrested. People who taint the political process with such dirty underhanded methods and in so doing incite others to do worse are not fit to rule.
A MAN has been arrested after a member of the British National Party was attacked with a hammer by protestors.
Dozens of people had surrounded a BNP trailer outside a pub in St Helens Road, Leigh.
Police arrived to find the trailer overturned.
Tony Ward, 48 - a member of the BNP - was hit on the head with a hammer. He was taken to hospital for treatment. Police said he was not seriously hurt.
A 25-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm.
A spokesman for GMP said officers had been called after reports of a fight.
St Helens Road had been closed for about an hour and diversions put in place, he added.
The clashes came after the BNP was forced to cancel a meeting in the town at the last minute. The party had planned to hold an event in the Pure Club last night featuring a speech by leader Nick Griffin.
The most disturbing thing about the systematic campaign of intimidation and violence against lawful and peaceful BNP election campaigners, which led to the brutal attack on Tony Ward in Leigh yesterday, is that it is openly supported and encouraged by senior Labour and Tory MPs.
The violence is being organised by the Labour Party front group UAF (Unite Against Fascism). At least 57 MPs are named on the UAF’s website as sponsors, and supporters of its thuggery.
BNP Leader Nick Griffin has today challenged these MPs to condemn unequivocally last night’s attack and all other instances of violence and intimidation carried out by UAF thugs. “Many Establishment politicians have recently been demanding that Sinn Fein MPs should condemn the murderous violence perpetrated by dissident republicans”, said Mr Griffin. “But the truth is that Sinn Fein have less control and influence over groups such as the Real IRA than the Labour party in particular has over its close allies and ideological bedfellows in the UAF.
The liberal media often express concern about attacks by government-sponsored thugs in places like Zimbabwe, but there’s really no difference between that and what is happening here. Any establishment politicians who can look at the photograph of Tony Ward’s bloodied face and continue to sponsor the criminal gang responsible for the attack is quite simply inciting further violence.
The full list of MPs supporting the UAF and its undemocratic violence can be seen below:
Ken Livingstone Tony Benn Peter Hain MP David Hanson MP Adam Price MP Barbara Follett MP Diane Abbott MP John Cryer MP John Trickett MP Keith Vaz MP Peter Bottomley MP Alice Mahon MP Alan Meale MP Ian Gibson MP Sir Teddy Taylor MP Harry Cohen MP Betty Williams MP Ken Purchase MP Alistair Carmichael MP Laura Moffatt MP Peter Bradley MP Vera Baird MP Bill Etherington MP Edward Garnier MP Roger Berry MP Angela Smith MP Brian Iddon MP Anthony Steen MP Mike Hancock MP Colin Pickthall MP Clive Betts MP Janet Anderson MP Neil Gerrard MP Jane Griffiths MP Brian Donohue MP Helen Clark MP Terry Davis MP Janet Dean MP Adrian Bailey MP David Cameron MP Louise Ellman MP Eric Illsley MP Kelvin Hopkins MP Ernie Ross MP Rob Marris MP Martin Caton MP Jim Sheridan MP Martin Jones MP Paul Tyler MP Colin Challen MP David Wright MP Rudi Vis MP Tony Worthington MP Derek Watts MP Julie Morgan MP Rev W Martin Smyth MP Diana Organ MP Doug Henderson MP Barry Gardiner MP
John Taylor and Kieran Quinn have been conspiring with violent far left thugs to bring this kind of behaviour to the streets of Tameside. We have proof which can be produced when needed.
Dear Roy, In any court you could prove your wife's distressing health problems and how she is dependant on your help and her health is being worsened by the threat of eviction, which is being exploited/harrasement by the numerous Labour Councillors who are involved with your housing trust.
The clear threat that your vote has increased every year and there is a strong possibility of you ousting the present Labour Cllr. It would appear that there is colusion with the other Labour Councillors.
It is clear that you and your family are being victimised and put under enormous stress. You are in fear of your wife health and safety. You may not have heard of this legal move that I am going to tell you about. Go to a Magistrates court as soon as possible and apply for what is known as a Magistrates Warrant on the grounds already stated. This does with away with any involvemt with solicitors. The Magistrates Warrant will be issued immediately. You know who the culprits are, have a warrant served on each one of them personally by your own hand. This will give them a week or two to attend court where they can be confronted and be forced to defend their actions.
Dear anon, thanks for your sincere advice however there is a possible problem with your suggestion. Not only is New Charter infested with Labourites, Tameside court is also suffering an infestation. Two of the three Dukinfield ward (Roy West's ward) councillors are serving Magistrates at Roy's local court.
This is just the first section of quite a long interview with Roy West. The next sections feature the plea change mid-trial, Roy's views on his neighbours, his partners current state of health and the eviction proceedings started by Labour/New Charter. The next instalments will be uploded soon.
Dear Roy, better still because it will expose them leaving them wide open to a higher court only madmen would risk it under there conditions ,to much involvment on there part justice must appear to be done they wont risk it ,and of course there would be great expence in the long run to them plus a very bad advertisment of being dare i say crooks!!!(XofPi=)
All very amateurish - but how do we know that what Mr West is uttering, and what he plans to utter next, is the truth? As he is on record as being a liar and a racist, how can we ever believe what he says or what his motives are? If his concern for his partner is genuine, surely he should be concentrating on caring for her and not stirring up more hysteria through this silly blog. The rules of the tenancy are clear and were always there - it seems to me that he broke them, not his partner. But he will drag her down with him. I hope in the next election, West gets in so that the people that vote for him and express support for him, get exactly what they voted for. Seems to me like his gravy train ride is coming to an end. By the way, Glenmore Resident, wish you'd have brought your petition a bit further afield.
Logic is the study of the principles of valid demonstration and inference. Logic is a branch of philosophy, a part of the classical trivium. The word derives from Greek λογική (logike), fem. of λογικός (logikos), "possessed of reason, intellectual, dialectical, argumentative", from λόγος logos, "word, thought, idea, argument, account, reason, or principle
Hold on a minute, I thought the whole incident centred on Roy West attempting to attach a flag to his neighbour’s property? On this video the spot Mr West points to is definitely on his side of the Berlin Wall, this whole episode is turning into one of the most shameful events in Tameside’s recent history.
Roy how many times have I warned you of the criminal intent of your local political opponents? They do not believe they are breaking the law because they believe they ARE the law.
"Shite" you may call it, but he certainly got his message across. If this whole affair is not politically orchestrated I would eat my hat. The video clearly shows that the flag was being erected on Roy West’s side of the divide and in his own garden.
Bearing in mind the massive amount of human detritus that exist in New Charter properties many of whom have long criminal records who have had warning after warning after warning...can the most ardent West hater on here explain why they think this attempted eviction ISN'T politically motivated.
To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer and impossible to ignore." —JBR Yant
Bang on Mr Anonymous, NewLabour will resort to any methods they are allowed to get away with. After losing the 1992 election, and facing destruction Labour sold out their fundamentally flawed and outdated 'principles' to get re-elected at ALL costs. The alternative was to admit socialism had failed. They now believe in NOTHING. The only way to avoid confronting this void at their core is to cling to power. They are concerned with nothing else and will do deals with ANYONE to gain votes and pursue ANY method no matter how detrimental to Britain's interests.
dealing with reality said... Mr West how do you plead? "Guilty" case closed.
15/03/09 14:04
"Mr Kisko, how do you plead"... "Birmingham six, how do you plead"... "Judith ward,how do you plead"... "Sally Clark, how do you plead"... "Jean Charles de Menezes....how do you...... BANG! BANG! BANG!
Anyone who opposes NewLabour is evil, fascist, morally inferior etc etc etc. When you've run out of arguments all that's left is namecalling and thuggery.
I thought the above all pleaded not guilty and kept their nerve in court. Lets be honest about this he did do it and he does have a history of abusive behaviour. It may not be a hanging offence but it does breach the tenancy agreement signed to get them this house. All he had to do was keep his mouth shut having pleaded guilty and apologised, but no not this guy he could not wait to get on the blog and make thinks worse. He knew his nieghbours would read it, I can remember the author of this blog warning people about this sort of thing,the victims in all this are his nieghbours not many come on here with any thought about them. None of you would want to live next door to this man I can assure you he would find some reason to attack you. When this all over no matter what the outcome don't you realise he will do the same again to someone,its his full time job.
Werneth Avenue Resident, you'd rather have the scum Mr West testified against living on your street would you? Don't pretend to be reasonable, you know he's had no previous warnings and was convicted of a minor offence and that New Charter have plenty of tenants who've committed far worse crimes and had multiple repeat warnings about behaviour and breaching their tenancy. Some of his blog comments may have been a bit daft but he's broken no laws so it's none of New Charter's business. My understanding is that the neighbour came out and confronted him when he was attempting to attach a flag to his own property which of course was none of his business and Mr West foolishly overreacted. You then make some totally unwarranted attack about what Mr West will do in the future, and you accuse HIM of making rash comments on this site. Just be honest and admit you don't like him and as such are incapable of being objective just like certain senior political figures in Tameside who pushed for his prosecution and are now pushing for his eviction.
'The leader of the Czech Republic, which holds the rotating European Union presidency, has warned that a "Europe of states" is in danger of turning into a "State of Europe", legislating on almost every aspect of people's lives but lacking in democracy and transparency.
In an interview with The Sunday Times, President Vaclav Klaus drew parallels between Brussels and the failed communist dictatorships of eastern Europe.'
Horst Mahler's Last Public Statement Horst Mahlers Vermächtnis Horst Mahler's Legacy Letzte Stellungnahme vor der Verhaftung vom 25.02.2009 His Last Statement Before Verdict and Imprisonment on 25 Feb. 2009
Translated from the German by J M Damon 3-23-9
I am sending this at the last moment.
After this I shall no longer have opportunity to address the public, so I am using this opportunity to briefly explain once more what is really at stake here.
I am now being sentenced and I shall be imprisoned immediately.
Many of my supporters disapprove of what I have done. They ask me: "Why are you doing this?"
{As part of the growing civil disobedience movement in Germany, Mahler had filed charges against himself for "Holocaust Denial."} Some of my supporters point out that I would be more effective on the outside than the inside of prison.
They say the government will now put me away and no benefit will come from it.
I explain to them that they are considering the matter from the wrong point of view.
The most important issue is no longer the fact that the present regime has taken away our right of free speech! This state has always had the power to do that, in any number of ways, regardless of whether one is expressing an opinion.. Something greater than the right to utter dissident remarks is at stake here.
If one realizes, as I do, that the "Holocaust" Religion is the principal weapon for the moral and cultural destruction of the German nation, then it is clear that what is at stake here is nothing less than the collective right of self-defense, that is, Germany's right to survive.
Survival affects everyone!
Does the world really believe that we Germans will unresistingly allow ourselves to be destroyed as a Volk, that we will passively allow our national spirit to be extinguished without a struggle?
What kind of jurists argue that self-defense is a criminal act?
As a Volk and a living collective entity we have a national and a spiritual nature.
The surest way to extinguish Germany as a spiritual entity is to destroy our national soul and identity, so that we no longer know who or what we are.
Destroying our national spirit is precisely the intent of our enemy in demanding that we unquestioningly accept his alien "Holocaust" dogma and desist from pointing out that his fantastic "Holocaust" never happened. There is no evidence of it!
Once we realize that we are faced with the threat of annihilation, we no longer have doubts about who our enemy is: it is the ancient murderer of nations.
Once we realize this, we no longer passively listen to the enemy's lies and misrepresentations. We look for a weapon and a way protect our Germany, to deprive the enemy of the power he has over us. Lo and behold, we have the only weapon we need to protect ourselves from annihilation. We have he truth.
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!"
A rather unusual aspect of my life history is that I entered politics from the left of the political spectrum, by way of the Red Army Faction (RAF).
{Mahler's critics never tire of stressing this political transition, although the definitions of "left" and "right" have changed drastically in the last twenty-five years.
These critics would do well to consider Ralph Waldo Emerson's aphorism "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." A wise man learns new things as he goes through life and changes his ideas accordingly.} Briefly stated, the RAF took the path of armed struggle against "the System" as it was called in those days.
The idea that motivated us to take the path of armed struggle was our belief in "Holocaust." We actually believed what "the System" had taught us in school and what was constantly proclaimed in the enemy-controlled media. Like others in the RAF, I believed this anti German propaganda. As the American culture bringers say, "I bought it." I truly believed it as I sought a way to break out of the unbearable guilt complex associated with the "murder of six million Jews." I cannot go into the details of this period of my life here -- the point to be made is that I was a "true believer" in "Holocaust" when I was young.
In 2001, in the course of my career as attorney, I was asked to defend a musical patriot. This was the singer Frank Rennicke, who had been convicted and sentenced in the lower courts for "Holocaust Denial." My response to his request was: "Of course I will defend you!"
The task of defending Frank made it necessary for me to investigate all the facts, evidence and allegations connected with "Holocaust." This is what my investigations revealed: There is no supporting evidence for the fantastic allegations of "Holocaust!" There are only proclamations released by the victors' tribunal at Nuremberg to the effect that such an event occurred and was sufficiently "investigated." With his proverbial chutzpah our enemy tells us: "No other event in all history has been as thoroughly investigated as 'Holocaust.'" [The same chutzpah leads the enemy to claim that the huge amounts of insecticide Germany used to protect the health of internees during World War II were used to murder Jews!] If we examine the actual facts, we discover that it is all a lie.
It is atrocity propaganda that is still being disseminated, 65 years after Germany's defeat. When the servile Bundesgericht (German High Court) declares that a thousand "eyewitnesses" support the "proven event," it is another bald-faced lie!
Our so-called Bundesgericht (High Court) understands perfectly well that our so-called Bundesrepublik (Federal Republic) is not a sovereign state and therefore not a legitimate government. Prof. Carlo Schmid, the internationally recognized expert on international law and author of our Grundgesetz (Basic Law), stated clearly that the Federal Republic is not a valid state. In a speech he gave on the occasion of its creation in 1949, he specifically describes it as an "Organisationsform einer Modalität der Fremdherrschaft" (Organizational Form of a Modality of Foreign Rule), that is to say, a vehicle for domination by our enemies. Prof. Schmid invented composed this diplomatic expression to avoid using the term "puppet government." Our Basic Law was not written by a convention of elected representatives and it was not approved by plebiscite. Enemy occupiers imposed it on us and it does not meet the prerequisites for a legitimate state. Since the Federal Republic is not a legitimate state, the institutions and stipulations that our enemiues forced upon us are likewise not legitimate under international law.
It is clear that the victors or victor of World War II (the only real victor was world Jewry) took great pains to assure that the basis for Jewish domination, namely the religious cult of "Holocaust," would be legalistically unassailable. This was their intent when they created the Federal Republic, and it is clear that the High Court long ago adopted a judicature designed to perpetuate "Holocaust." The mission to protect "Holocaust" lies at the heart of both the Federal Republic and the Basic Law. This is the basis of Germany's domination by its enemies.
Germany's foreign minister Joschka Fischer explained this very clearly when he referred to "Holocaust" and sponsorship of Israel as the raison d'etre of the Federal Republic.
What is happening now is nothing other than the destruction of the moral foundation of our Volk through genocidal assault on our national soul. There is nothing surprising about this.
We would have to consider our enemies really stupid, especially our most powerful and dangerous enemy, if he did not take decisive measures to maintain domination over us. Our enemies did not launch World War II against us in order to abandon their war aims after the inevitable victory of their overpowering resources of numbers and materiel. They went to great lengths to avoid giving us the possibility of exonerating ourselves ourselves from the Great Lie through authentic trials conducted by a professional and independent judiciary. Our greatest enemy is not stupid!
He took painstaking precautions, and he is all too familiar with elaborate methods to assure compliance with his peculiar brand of "justice."
No one who perceives that our enemy is still perpetrating genocide against us as part of his war aims can expect a German to obey the proscription against questioning "Holocaust." No one can expect that a German who wants to be German will not object to this assault against our nation. This assault is nothing less than cultural genocide, and it threatens us all.
If possible, I ask you to dare to imagine what necessarily follows from this, if it is really the case. What a wretched excuse for a human being I would be if I, knowing of this threat to our nation in all its implications, would keep quiet and sink back in my easy chair and just wait for the day when the truth would come to light of its own accord! Every German has an obligation to do his duty to the Fatherland!
We have a right and sacred to defend ourselves, to preserve our nation and our Volk! In every civilized country, there is a legal obligation to come to the aid of those who are in danger. In fact, the law prescribes punishments for those who fail to render aid.
Failure to assist and render aid is a serious violation of law; it constitutes a corpus delicti in itself. I would be guilty of a serious crime if I failed to render aid to my Volk - if I kept quiet and failed to come to its aid, knowing that the monstrous fraud called "Holocaust" did not really occur. In that case, I would be a truly depraved criminal!.
In the present situation, it would be pointless for me to plod along and attempt to gain a majority in this or that political party, or to found a new and independent party that would somehow make its way through our corrupt and labyrinthine parliament to repeal genocidal anti-German laws. Working alone, my only course of action is to continue doing what I have done. Relying on myself alone, I can do nothing except repeat the truth over and over again. I have sworn a sacred oath that can be read on the Internet, our only source of uncensored information, that I will never desist from repeating this truth: "Holocaust" is a lie, and so is the claim that it has been "proven." There is no supporting evidence.
In his undaunted defense of the Christian faith, the traditionalist Bishop Richard Williamson recently stated the same truth that I discovered long ago.
In the Rennicke case I was professionally obligated to investigate the evidence of "Holocaust" and it turned out that no such evidence exists. After reviewing several similar trials, we were able to produce a letter written by a professor of contemporary history, Prof. Gerhard Jagschitz of Vienna, whose research had also led to the conclusion that there is no evidence to support "Holocaust." When I contacted him he said: "Yes, of course, we already know that." Prof. Jagschitz had been commissioned by the court as an expert witness to determine whether "Holocaust" is "manifestly obvious" as an actual event of contemporary history. He spent three years researching all the available literature concerning "Holocaust" in order to determine the actual truth. After these three years he informed the court that he could no longer defend his original assumption in support of the validity of "Holocaust." He arrived at the emphatic conclusion that, within the guidelines of a society of laws, it is not permissible to use the "manifest self-evidence" of "Holocaust" as a basis for sentencing those found guilty of questioning it. In those days it was Prof. Jagschitz and now it is Bishop Williamson, and soon there will be many other prominent persons who arrive at this same conclusion.
Self-defense is an inalienable right. As a German who wants to be German I am personally affected by this assault against my Volk. The German nation is not only entitled to defend itself, it is in fact obligated to defend itself. Because of our cultural substance, we as a nation in central Europe have the duty and obligation to resist attempts to destroy us culturally, to annihilate us as a Volk and a spiritual entity. This is what is at stake! I do not choose to wait for others to defend the German nation - I choose to do it myself! I am telling the truth as I perceive it, and the truth is that the so-called "Holocaust" never happened. That is the obvious reason why there is no evidence of it! There is nothing to support "Holocaust" except the verdicts of Moscow type show trials. These verdicts are constantly hammered into our heads by the Jewish media as "proof" that "Holocaust" was real and that there is an abundance of evidence to support it.
Those who enforces and perpetuate this blood libel is guilty of treason against the German nation. Most notorious among these traitors are the judges of the High Court, who sanctify and reinforce the decisions of the lower courts concerning the absurd "manifest obviousness" of "Holocaust." This is worse than merely perverting justice -- it is carrying out deliberate genocide against the German people. I have proven the guilt of the robed traitors in Karlsruhe numerous times and I shall continue to stress this even while in prison.
I am facing twelve years' imprisonment. How willl it all end? I am 73 years old, and so this is a life sentence for me. My sentence proves that in Germany today, life imprisonment can be imposed for anyone who refuses do obeisance to the Great Lie. The Jews, of course, are always willing to "bargain." First the dissident is lightly punished, perhaps with just a fine. Or there can be a prison sentence of just a few months, which can be probated. One always has a chance of getting off easily by kowtowing to the Great Lie and giving assurances that there will be no more difficulties in future. This is precisely what the enemy wants.
Anyone who is convinced that life under the Great Lie is not worth living must be kept behind bars forever. Since I have openly expressed this sentiment countless times, knowing full well that the cudgel would fall, the enemy will most assuredly keep me in prison for the rest of my life. The enemy must demonstrate to the cowed public what is really at stake here! Obviously we Germans are now in a situation in which we must rot away our entire lives if we do not submit to the Great Lie. Whatever happens to me I can only say, as our Savior says in the Evangel of St. Matthew: "Whoever is not willing to take up his cross is not worthy of me!"
We are not worthy to call ourselves Germans if we do not stand up for the truth, but unresistingly submit to the Great Lie!
However, I am confident that Germany's historic plight is about to change.
The struggle over the authenticity of "Holocaust" and dominance of "Holocaust" dogma is now raging within the Catholic Church. The Church is still a great power, even though its leadership has been corrupted and undermined by the Jews. With its great wealth and hundreds of millions of faithful followers, the Church is the rock on which the ship of the Great Lie will crash and perish.
The Jews are about to experience their Waterloo.
Once "Holocaust" is openly discussed, knowledge of its true nature can no longer be suppressed. When the Bishop Williamson affair reaches the point at which a sitting pope is forced to again excommunicate him, as the head of ADL (Anti Defamation League: the fighting organization of world Jewry) demands; or if, under pressure of the Jewish media and corrupt politicians, Pope Benedict XVI abdicates the Throne of Peter, this will be an excruciating shock for the Catholic world, and the truth will break through on this account! Christian faith is based on the Truth, the Rock of Ages.
The Truth will make us free and the will to be free will grow stronger until it is irresistible, and then we will prevail. As for me, I have done everything I could do. I have set an example.
I have often said that ours is the easiest revolution that was ever carried out. We need only for a few thousand persons to rise up and speak the truth as clearly and openly as Bishop Williamson has done and I have attempted to do, along with the others who have filed legal complaints against themselves for telling the truth and distributing Germar Rudolf's "Lectures on the Holocaust."
The ultimate victory of the truth is inevitable, as is the defeat of the global Zionist Empire. However, we have no way of knowing how much more time must pass, or the exact circumstances that will usher in the victory of the truth. We have to wait and see.
At present we are witnessing another collapse of the global Jewish financial system. The Jewish power base, the temple of their god JahwehMammon, has been struck in the heart by the collapse of their predatory banking system. Jewish power is based on money power, which buys them control of the politicians and media. At present they are losing this money power.
Once they lose it, they also lose control of government and public opinion. Their control of public opinion has already been weakened by the rise of the uncensored Internet, which they are unable suppress. When they lose control of the media, they will be in a pitiable condition indeed!
When that happens, the Jews will be grateful that we understand and accept their historic role in world redemption. We recognize their destructive tyranny as a revelation of the path of God through the world to Himself, as the philosopher Hegel explained. We respect the Jews as the followers of Satan and we accept them in the certainty that we can redeem them as well as ourselves, by bringing the Truth into the world through our deeds. The Jews are in dire need of redemption, and they will one day be grateful to us!
****************
Here's freedom to him who would speak, Here's freedom to him who would write; For there's none ever feared that the truth should be heard, Save him whom the truth would indict! ROBERT BURNS (175996)
Thursday, March 19, 2009 Australia to fine its residents $11,000 for visiting 10,000 politically incorrect websites
Perhaps the Aussie's should have been a bit more verbal a decade ago when their government started fining and persecuting those that questioned certain aspects of history associated with the holocaust lie? Please note that the below article, which doesn't condemn the Australian governments censorship in any way, was written by a Jew.
The decision to ban George Galloway from Canada seems odd, but now it emerges that the Jewish Defence League (JDL) pressured the Canadian Government to do so. The action takes on sinister connotations for Canada, why? Because the Jewish Defence League are according to the FBI a Terrorist Group. In its report, Terrorism 2000/2001, the FBI referred to the JDL as a “violent extremist Jewish organization”. This “violent extremist Jewish organization” now it seems has power and influence over the Canadian Government.
Canadians are just waking up to the fact that Israel controls their government just as much as it does the USA. And note that inevitably, the Israeli shill has to fall back on the Holocaust to try to bludgeon his way through Galloway’s arguments. The good point is watching the Israeli whore thrashing around and clearly aware that he is losing the war for legitimacy in the public eye.]
Here are some frightening statistics that a friend just emailed to me, Off topic but I thought worth a mention. "Nearly the entire population of earth are Asian, Nearly all the rest are black, A small percentage are white. There is only one minority group on earth, Us the white folks and we are the only group that is openly discriminated against in every country of the world'. It seems that in global terms we are already the Diminitude.
The Green Crescent madrassa, in Bangladesh: Police claim it is a militant training camp It has emerged that the father-of-three was also given a suspended sentence for trying to board a plane with a pistol in his suitcase last year. The Charity Commission said tonight it was investigating the allegations, which it said it was taking very seriously.
On Monday Bangladeshi security forces raided the orphanage and attached Muslim school on the remote island of Bhola in South Bangladesh.
They discovered explosives to make 'several hundred' grenades, as well as ammunition, remote control devices and radical Islamic books. A teacher and three caretakers have been arrested but Mostafa, who is in his mid-40s, is being searched for in Bangladesh. Lt Col Munir Haque, an officer involved in the operation by the Rapid Action Battalion, said: 'We found small arms – about nine or 10 in total – plus equipment to make small arms, about 3,000 rounds of ammunition, two walkie-talkies, two remote control devices and four sets of army uniforms.
'We also found enough explosives and other equipment to make several hundred grenades. We found some ordinary Islamic books, but others that are in line with extremists like Bin Laden.' He said that there were about 11 children between the ages of 7 and 8 at the compound at the time of the raid, but no other adults.
K M Mamunur Rashid, another officer involved in the raid, said: 'It is a big madrassa and we have so far gathered that this whole compound is being used for militant training,' he said.
He added that the charity had plans to build two more madrassas, viewed by the authorities as recruiting grounds for militant groups. Mostafa, who has a PhD in chemistry from Manchester Polytechnic, was cleared of conspiracy to cause explosions with intent to endanger life at Birmingham Crown Court in 2002. He was working as a teacher at a Birmingham mosque when MI5 agents swooped on a flat where they discovered bin liners containing chemicals, electronic devices and gloves with traces of HMTD, a high explosive. Mostafa denied involvement with any terror organisation and told the jury that chemicals and explosive materials were intended to make fireworks. His co-accused, Moinul Abedin, was jailed for 20 years after being found guilty of planning to cause explosions around the UK. In 1996, Mostafa had been cleared at Manchester Crown Court of involvement in a terrorist bomb plot campaign with two other students after explosives were found at his home.
But he was found guilty of illegally possessing a firearm, sentenced to four years in prison and banned for life from possessing a firearm. In July last year he was caught trying to board a plane to Bangladesh with a gas-powered pistol and bullet parts in his luggage.
He was arrested at Manchester Airport by security officials and claimed the gun was a gift for his brother, as part of a hunting and fishing trip with his wife and three children. The charge carried a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment but Mostafa was sentenced to 56 days in prison, suspended for two years, and 100 hours' community service. According to its website, the Green Crescent charity was set up by students in 1998, with the motto, 'Individuals with vision are capable of changing society in a positive way'. Last year it had an income of £63,000 for 'long-term educational and health projects'. The Charity Commission, which awarded Green Crescent charity status in 2004, last night came under fire from partner organisations in shock about Dr Mostafa's record. Saeed Mahmood, of the Stockport-based charity Human Appeal International, said: 'Faisal comes in every few months about mainland projects in Bangladesh. We only work with organisations that are registered with the Charity Commission so we had no idea about these allegations. 'I'm taken aback. The Charity Commission should have told us if they knew and if they didn't know, why not?' A spokesman from counter-terrorism think-tank the Quilliam Foundation added: 'If the Green Crescent charity has indeed been involved in militant activity, this will reflect very poorly on the Charity Commission, particularly given that Mostafa, the head of the charity, had previously been put on trial twice for terrorist offences. 'Ineffectiveness by the Charity Commission in identifying and tackling extremist charities leads to the British taxpayer directly subsiding militancy and extremism.' Andrew Hind, Chief Executive of the Charity Commission said: 'We are working with relevant law enforcement and other agencies to investigate the allegation that terrorist activity is connected with the charity. The matter is of serious concern to us, and we are taking this action given the gravity of the matter, the public interest and the need to protect charity work and funds.
'We intend, as is normal procedure, to publish a statement of the results of the inquiry setting out our findings once the inquiry is completed.'
"We [have] dismantled the most ancient of human laws, the law against usury, which had existed in some form in every civilization from the time of the Babylonian Empire to the end of Jimmy Carter's term." From: Infinite Debt, Harpers' Magazine - How Unlimited Interest Rates Destroyed the Economy." By Thomas Geoghegan
THOMAS GEOGHEGAN: In the article, that appeared in Harper's, I've talked about the fact that we've not focused enough on the big deregulation that precedes all other deregulations, and that's the ceiling that has existed on the financial sector since time immemorial on the amount of interest that banks can get from their clients, their customers, their depositors. Historically, and even up through movies like It's a Wonderful Life with Frank Capra and Mr. Potter and George Bailey, the interest rates in this country were capped at eight percent, nine percent. In the 1970s, we began to deregulate this, and then we had a massive big bang with a Supreme Court case that effectively knocked out all the interest rate caps. And we have today, taken as common, that banks can charge 17, 18, 19, 30, 35 percent, not to mention payday lenders charging 200, 300, 400 percent in states like Illinois, California."
"If you're able to charge 30 percent or, in a payday lender case, 200 or 300 percent, you don't care so much if the loan-in fact, you actually want the loan not to be repaid. You want people to go into debt. You want to accumulate this interest. And this addicted the financial sector to very, very, very high rates of return compared to what investors were used to getting in the real economy, the manufacturing sector, General Motors, which would give piddling five, six, seven percent returns.
So the capital in this country began to shift in the financial sector. That's why the financial sector began to bloat up. That's why we ended up, by 2006, having a third of all profits going into the banks and the financial firms and not into the real economy." (1)
?These cords of dynamite that blew the lid off interest caps; have taken away our freedoms and insured that, like our money, our financial options have nearly been destroyed. This all began with the appointment of Gerald R. Ford and the 25th Amendment that made his administration possible. Ford did a lot more than just officially pardon Nixon: because he also appointed Rockefeller as his VP, who was able to quietly connect all those secret decisions that linked corporate banking to the military-congressional-industrial-complex; which opened the way for the formal creation of the New World Order, and simultaneously unplugged the public from any role in this entire travesty, as depicted in the 1974 illustration above.
The recent changes in the Bankruptcy laws, penalize individuals far beyond what most people can afford: while at the same time Congress liberalized the Business Bankruptcy Laws to the point where when a business goes bankrupt today; this amounts to taking a brief shower that allows them to shed all of their most painful obligations while retaining all their assets. In other words; Bankruptcy for Businesses is the exact opposite of what happens to individuals, when they are forced into personal Bankruptcy. And it is this form of bankruptcy that awaits the automotive industry, and probably almost every major corporation that still has labor contracts or social obligations to their employees, such as retirement accounts, or medical guarantees. So when you hear about how dire things will be if one or more of our major industries is about to be forced into bankruptcy, you might want to run it through this simple lense-before deciding as to "what will be lost."
The 'Bankruptcy Card' now belongs completely to the owners, just like their "get-out-of-jail-free" Card. There are so many different facets to their use and abuse of Usury that it literally boggles the mind. But then that is why 'Usury Laws have existed in some form in every civilization from the time of the Babylonian Empire,' except for now, under the watchful eye of the Illuminati and the New World Order.
For instance; 'the problem' that Obama and Geithner supposedly addressed was "toxic housing stocks" when the real problem is still "toxic banks, and their thoroughly criminal practices and procedures. By the end of January of this year the FED had already dispensed $11.5 Trillion to the shadow government of this country-yet MSM is currently claiming that only $4 Trillion plus has been allocated thus far (about a third of the actual amount). Until government begins to level with the public this monstrosity will only get bigger because the real causes of all our problems are in the details of everything they say they're doing; and are not mentioned in any of the endless press conferences that Obama continues to give. (2)
Yesterday's announcement offered this "deal" to the taxpayers. 'We put up 94% of the investment while the private financial institutions put up 6% of the investment: Then we and the "vulture capitalists" each get 50% of the profits, if there are any. This is the brilliant plan that Geithner and Obama would not reveal the details of, the first time they tried to force this down our throats. Yesterday was a re-run, nothing new, except that this time they were comfortable with telling us about this, as they were certain that none of the idiots in the public would understand what is really going on.
There are no real changes in the way that bonuses are paid either, except for AIG. They failed to mention this part of that deal as well. The changes only apply to AIG, and not to any of the other obscene bailouts or the outrageous bonuses paid to their executives-because as usual they haven't fixed the system: They have only tinkered with one instance of 'a problem' that managed to seriously anger a great many people. What happens when and IF the public ever learns the truth about the entire monetary collapse that is continuing without interruption in the real world? I'd love to hear about what happened to that $11.5 Trillion (as of 1-31-09) that has since been added to, no doubt: How about you, aren't you even curious?
There is a 'solution' floating around out there in the shadows: it's called the 28th Amendment and could, if enacted, eliminate the corporate personhood status, that has caused all this criminality to have such a hugely successful run through this lawless place that it has structured, since that travesty was successfully created out of the 14th Amendment.
The 14th Amendment was used by the corporations to acquire personhood. But the 14th Amendment was intended to protect the then recently-freed African-American slaves from racism-just one more example of the strong-arm legal tactics used to alter this Republic and turn it into just another fiefdom of, by and for, the Super-rich! (3)
If we do not begin to protect ourselves from this government, then we shall become the new slaves that the Illuminati and the New World Order were formed to create here, in the first place.
kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net
1) Thomas Geoghegan on "Infinite Debt: How Unlimited Interest Rates Destroyed the Economy" - video & partial transcript http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/24/thomas_geoghegan_on_infinite_debt_how 2) Delusion & Denial http://www.kirwanesque.com/politics/articles/2009/art17.htm 3) Proposed Amendment to Article 28 http://www.realdemocracy.com/28web.htm
INFORMATION COMING THROUGH THE GRAPEVINE ERIC THE FISH THE LEFT WING KIPPER HAS BEEN DENOUNCING THE BNP VIA THE STINKY PHILLIPS RADIO SHOW TODAY. BOTH STINKY AND FISHY HAVE BEEN VISITING THE BNP WEBSITES. THEY ARE UPSET WITH THE COMMON PURPOSE VIDEO THIS IS TO BE DISCUSSED IN TOMORROWS (27TH MARCH) RADIO PROGRAMME ON RADIO MESERYSIDE BETWEEN 12 AND 2PM. THIS DESERVES OUR ATTENTION
As a vicar I cannot identify openly with any patriotic parties for fear of losing my position - unfortunately the multi-racialists and liberals have too much influence in the Church of England. As a Christian patriot I believe that immigration should be ended and non-white immigrants encouraged through financial incentives to repatriate back to their homelands of ancestral origin. In the Holy Bible we read what will happen if this is not carried out; race hatred, racial violence and race riots will blight our land.
Whether you consider the issue from a secular or Biblical perspective, all "humans" do not share a common ancestry. The idea that all humans are "family" is a lie propagated by the ruling Jewish Establishment and the apostate "Judeo-Christian" churches -- and supported by the fraudulent theory of evolution -- which serves as a basis for the "multicultural", race-mixing, and "one world community" agenda that is designed to destroy the white race through mongrelization and absorption with the non-white races.
Biologically and scientifically speaking, how is it possible for the pure-blooded black, asian, and white races to have descended from Adam and Eve, Noah and his wife, or any other common ancestor? Could Adam and Eve reproduce and have black, white, and asian children? Of course not. That's biologically impossible.
The black, white, and asian races -- in their pure-blooded states, absent any mixing among the races -- are of completely different lineage. They were created separately, and are essentially different species of "humans." The fact that separate races can interbreed (and produce hybrid species) is not proof of common origin or common species, as this phenomenon exists among other animals -- eg, lion and tiger can mate and produce a hybrid "liger", horse and donkey to produce mule, etc.
Police identify 200 children as potential terrorists
Drastic new tactics to prevent school pupils as young as 13 falling into extremism
Two hundred schoolchildren in Britain, some as young as 13, have been identified as potential terrorists by a police scheme that aims to spot youngsters who are "vulnerable" to Islamic radicalisation.
The number was revealed to The Independent by Sir Norman Bettison, the chief constable of West Yorkshire Police and Britain's most senior officer in charge of terror prevention.
He said the "Channel project" had intervened in the cases of at least 200 children who were thought to be at risk of extremism, since it began 18 months ago. The number has leapt from 10 children identified by June 2008.
Greek Jews 'shocked' after Holocaust denier is acquitted by Athens Appeals court
According to Moses Constantinis (R), president of the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece, the prosecutor characterized Plevris’s defamatory book – which denies the Holocaust, calls the Jews “sub-human” and threatens them with the “re-opening of the crematoria in Auschwitz- a “scientific work”. ATHENS (EJP)---The Greek Jewish community said Friday it was “shocked” after neo-Nazi militant Kostas Plevris, who wrote a book denying the Holocaust and containing offensive references to Jews, was acquitted by an Appeals court in Athens.
Plevris was found not guilty of “incitement to racial hatred and violence against the Jews” by the 5-member court.
In a reaction, the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece (KIS) expressed its “disappointment and amazement at the decision of the Athens court.
"This decision saddens and causes concern among citizens of a modern democratic society as a self-confessed advocate of Nazism and racism remains unpunished though he not only distorts proven historical evidence, but even worse, uses his pen to incite hatred and provoke discrimination and violence against citizens of Greece and Europe," the Central Board said.
“The Greek Jewry believes that the fundamental constitutional right of freedom of speech has nothing to do with the direct threats, insults and incitement to racial hatred and violence against the Jews that Plevris includes in his book" titled “Jews-The whole truth” .
Plevris had been convicted in first instance in December 2007 and condemned to 14 months of imprisonment on probation for three years for “racial insult”, “incitement to hatred and racial violence” on the basis of the 1979 anti-racist law.
At the time, the Jewish community saw the trial as a key test of the Greek authorities’ determination to deal with anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial in a country where anti-Semitic literature such as the infamous “Protocols of the elders of Zion” is on sale in bookshops.
The charges against Plevris were also brought by the Helsinki Monitor and the “Anti-Nazi Initiative” organization, two human right Greek NGO’s.
He immediately appealed the sentence.
According to Moses Constantinis, the Appeals court prosecutor characterized Plevris’s defamatory book – which denies the Holocaust, calls the Jews “sub-human” and threatens them with the “re-opening of the crematoria in Auschwitz- a “scientific work”.
To express the resentment of the Greek Jews, the Jewish umbrella body has decided not to be represented at the European symposium “Building together the Future of Europe” which will be held next Monday in Brussels, “given that theoretical analysis and statements made by Greek MEPs on the denunciation and condemnation of anti-Semitism are meaningless”.
CP BBC Merseyside Radio biased interview with Brian Gerrish (see full archive article) (02/04/2009) BBC and Media So rattled is Common Purpose by the steady leak of information revealing its political agenda and huge fees taken from the taxpayer, that they have now apparently enlisted the BBC to manage their tawdry image. Brian Gerrish was recently invited to speak concerning CP on BBC Radio Mersyside on Friday 27 March 2009 after the Presenter Roger Phillips linked his name with the BNP. Mr Phillips claimed that he was only able to find material by Brian Gerrish on the BNP's website. This is despite the fact that a single entry of the name Brian Gerrish in Google produces hundreds of linked articles and talks. Brian complained at the BBC bias and was quickly invited onto the Friday lunchtime show apparently to star the local Liverpool Common Purpose Director Ken Pye.
On the day, and not surprisingly, Mr Pye was 'unable' to appear. This left Roger Phillips to attempt to discredit Brian Gerrish. Normal tactics were used including suggestions of 'conspiracy theory', BNP and claims that Common Purpose was 'suffering' under Freedom of Information requests from the public. But why was Mr Phillips so keen to defend and support Common Purpose?
Aside from the fact that hundreds of BBC senior staff have been Common Purpose trained at £3950 plus VAT each (see BBC and media Archive of this site), Mr Phillips is a regular participant in Liverpool Common Purpose net-working events, alongside none other than Mr Ken Pye. Using license payers money on air Mr Phillips was happy to make claims trying to highlight the honesty and probity of Common Purpose although he had no documents or evidence to support his claims. Phillips apparently made further supportive claims for Common purpose after Brian Gerrish had left the show. Is this what the BBC is for...Common Purpose advertising? Mr Phillips had also failed to look at any of the documentary evidence on this site. So the interview was again biased. Welcome to Common Purpose control of the media. The interview will be posted on this site shortly. See the BBC Media Archive section on cpexposed.com for a copy of a Phillips / Pye Common Purpose event.
Apart from death, competition is the most inescapable fact of life .
And competition is fundamentally about survival in an over-populated world with finite resources. This competition takes many forms, ranging from the violent interactions of the natural world through warfare and commercial rivalries to the most subtle connivings for social advancement. Also, the predatory and parasitical tactics for survival we see in the animal world have their counterparts in human society, although frequently disguised and of a more insidious nature. The predatory animal can only survive by consuming other creatures; thus its prey is assimilated into its own life. In human society the predation operates at the psychological level , in the competition for power, influence and ‘a place in the world’ . Our selfhood is engaged in a constant war of survival amongst other selfhoods no less inclined to be self-assertive. The more predatory , that is to say egotistical selves expand their own place in the world by, as it were, consuming other selves. It’s a kind of social theatre, a stage crowded with people contending for the star roles and where the less assertive or advantaged are upstaged and marginalised as anonymous ‘extras’ . We are seeing this today in the so-called ‘celebrity’ culture, where certain individuals are described as such simply for having a sizeable following in such fields as fashion, popular entertainment, sport, politics, literature, industry and art. The ‘fans’ of such people are the prey of their ‘celebrities’. They have, in a manner of speaking, been consumed, in that their own identities have been diminished and perhaps nearly extinguished by that of the person ‘celebrated’ . We see this most vividly in popular entertainment, with its ‘stars’ and tumultuous ‘fans’ sacrificing their own individuality on the altar of their idol.. In the political sphere it is the ‘front benchers’ hogging the limelight and calling the tune, with a largely unimpressive motley in the background; irresistibly reminding us of the Gilbert&Sullivan musical comedy ‘where everybody’s somebody and no one’s anybody’ .
Of course everybody wants to be ‘somebody’. Much of the anxiety and neurosis affecting modern society has to do with a feeling of lost personal significance, of being merged into faceless and futile anonymity by some bureaucracy or regime . Almost any stage-managed ego-trip is therefore bound to attract people hoping the self-assertion will be infectious enough to invest their own lives with some meaning. But more often than not the hope is unfulfilled ; the excitement fades, and the more perceptive finally realise they have simply enhanced somebody else’s selfhood at the expense of their own.
The ‘enlisters’ are always with us. A conspicuous example in our so-called ‘multicultural’ society is the Muslim immigrant , whose own sense of identity is chained to a long ago desert prophet, even to the extent of adopting the same name. Detached from his prophet’s identity the individual Muslim is socially and culturally floundering, his selfhood dissolved. And of course the self-abasement he’s obliged to exhibit at prayer meetings emphasises his own feeling of insignificance. Devotees of this religion in particular are obliged to discard anything resembling personal freedom of thought and action as the price of salvation ; they must cease to be authentic individuals except in the most superficial respects. But they are not alone in this compulsion to affirm and perhaps enhance personal selfhood by identifying with some charismatic figure or prestigious group; hence Marxists, Buddhists, Maoists, Keynesians,
‘Common Purpose’ nuts, Stalinists and such. In all such cases the price of membership is diminution of personal choice and judgement ; subordination to somebody else’s assertiveness , principles and values.
To be sure this may even be advantageous to some otherwise disorientated or alienated individuals. But the authentic individual embodies a much more robust selfhood, capable of holding its own against all the intimidatory pressures of officialdom, the mass media, advertisers, commercial, political, religious and other agencies seeking to subordinate and enlist one’s identity to their own advantage.
This can never be easy, and such individuals are apt to experience quite a lot of personal differences, suspicion, pressures to conform and moments of self-doubt in some circumstances. Even so, they retain a sturdy selfhood in exercising freedom of thought and choice , always too large, complex and independent for any bureaucratic questionnaire , market researcher or ideologue. They are not easily and conveniently pigeonholed, labelled or enlisted by those seeking to expand and impose their own selfhood, however well-disguised as altruistic philanthropists.
You will have noticed that most people are much more interested in discovering what you are than who you are., since that tends to govern their reaction to you . That you are called William Bloggs is a matter of supreme indifference to all except close relatives ; but how different the reactions if you are introduced as Sir, Doctor, Professor, the Reverend, Colonel, Judge, Chairman, for example ! In mischievous mode with a couple friends I made such social experiments many years ago. Introduced at different parties as a psychoanalyst, psychic researcher, Detective Inspector, company director, stockbroker or journalist, one learned much about social psychology very quickly, though of course careful to avoid any harm to those involved in this light-hearted deception.
But rugged individuality is anathema to the kind of control freaks we have in government these days . The only identity they want you to have is the one they think necessary to fit their totalitarian mould. Without toting an official card and serial number from womb to tomb you will be what the Communists called a non-person. And according to them the most conspicuous alien becomes ‘as British as anybody else’ by ticking a few boxes and reciting a few words to a Home Office plonker before dashing off to collect social services benefits.
As justifiably proud but not arrogant members of the most accomplished race and nation on the planet, we owe no apologies and don’t much care what other races and nations think about us. With centuries of closer social and cultural integration than you can find anywhere else in the world, we don’t need immigrant whinges about integration, Marxist pseudo-comrades, or black bishops lecturing us about the brotherhood of man while their blood relatives are being slaughtered by the tens of thousands back in Africa). No black, Asian or other alien is capable of representing the interests of the British people in any capacity whatsoever, though such might occasionally be hired on a temporary basis to serve British purposes. Every inch of British soil belongs to the British people and no one else ; and we are not bound by any laws made by people not elected by or accountable directly to us. And where such illicit laws are applied, we reserve the inalienable right to ignore , frustrate and subvert them at every opportunity. The fact that this government condemns us for this patriotic stand makes its own perfidy all the more conspicuous. In short, we know well enough who and what we are and are as content with it until we ourselves see fit to make changes..
Meanwhile anybody who looks like an alien, talks like an alien and acts like an alien is always going to be seen as an alien by all the natives of our own happy breed. So if you meet anyone contending otherwise, just spit in their eye.
EU trains a new diplomatic corps - without waiting for Lisbon Treaty The European Union was accused of "contempt for democracy" on Sunday after it emerged that hundreds of members of a new diplomatic service are being trained - even though the Lisbon Treaty that creates it has not come into effect.
By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels Last Updated: 3:05PM BST 12 Apr 2009
Five hundred and thirty staff from the European Commission have already begun training to build a "shared diplomatic culture and an esprit de corps" for the EU's putative External Action Service (EEAS).
Irish voters blocked the Lisbon Treaty, which provides the legal basis for a new Euro-diplomatic corps, when they rejected the renamed EU Constitution in a referendum last June.
Related Articles European Commission may extend term to see through stalled Lisbon treaty Czechs 'have obligation' to pass Lisbon Treaty despite government's collapse William Hague interview: Gordon Brown could be forced into European referendum Caroline Flint, Europe minister, hasn't read Lisbon Treaty Forget the G20 mob, coping-class fury is about to reach boiling pointThe disclosure that the Commission has simply pressed on regardless and begun training the euro-diplomats infuriated Irish politicians. Ireland is expected to hold a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty in October.
Declan Ganley, an Irish campaigner for a "No" vote, said: "It is cause for serious concern that, by implementing the Lisbon Treaty, EU institutions are manifesting outright contempt for democracy."
Privately, EU officials are aware of the sensitivity of going ahead with training a euro-diplomatic corps. "We are trying to push the envelope as far as we can within the current environment," said one official in "European Voice", a Brussels weekly.
Staff are being discreetly trained, "without being too obvious", on 59 courses with the help of foreign ministries from 17 member states, according to EU sources.
The training aims to foster a "specifically European dimension of diplomacy" and to "create a sense of common European purpose" for the new service. Ireland is one of four EU member states - the others are Poland, the Czech Republic and Germany - which have yet to ratify the Lisbon Treaty. Under the EU's founding rules, no treaty of this kind can come into effect without the unanimous approval of all member states.
The Conservatives demanded to know whether the Foreign Office was among the national governments aiding the training courses. Mark Francois, the Conservative spokesman on the EU, said: "This project shows just how much more power Brussels would gain over our foreign policy. It is outrageous that the British people are being denied any say over it. That's why the Conservatives will be campaigning for a referendum in the European elections."
Secret negotiations, revealed last year by The Daily Telegraph, have agreed that the EEAS will take over the EU's existing representative offices - there are currently more than 160 across the world - which will be granted the same legal diplomatic status as national embassies.
The new EU service will rival established national diplomatic corps. Britain, with one of the world's largest diplomatic services, maintains 139 Embassies and High Commissions. Britain narrowly blocked a proposal to call the EU's representative offices the "Embassies of the Union" during secret talks last spring.
The EEAS will be overseen by a new European "foreign minister", renamed the "High Representative of the Union". If Ireland's voters approve the Lisbon Treaty in a second referendum, this official will be selected, along with a new EU president, at a summit in December.
Privately, officials are concerned that disclosure of the EU's pre-emptive moves could sway Irish voters and make a "Yes" vote in the referendum harder to achieve. Secret minutes on the EEAS negotiations recognise the need "to remain cautious in presenting these issues" ahead of the second Irish vote.
64 comments:
Welldone Westy
Now we can all see how politics really work
Labour are trying to intimidate and harass the BNP because of the nationwide increase in their vote, especially in Labour areas. They will employ any tactics such as using their politicized Police Force to arrest people on spurious grounds like the recent case in Liverpool where 13 BNP members were arrested and held in the cells all day for distributing a perfectly legal political leaflet. All charges were dropped a few days later. The political persecution of Mr West and the use of extreme left-wing agitators in election campaigns creates an atmosphere of tension and conflict which can result in incidents like the one in Leigh last night where an 'anti- fascist' rentamob attacked a BNP vehicle and trailer dragged out the occupants and attacked them with a clawhammer and also extebsively damaged the vehicle. One BNP member needed eleven stitches as a result and several of the thugs were arrested.
People who taint the political process with such dirty underhanded methods and in so doing incite others to do worse are not fit to rule.
West has to be admired for his dooged determination if nothing else.
A MAN has been arrested after a member of the British National Party was attacked with a hammer by protestors.
Dozens of people had surrounded a BNP trailer outside a pub in St Helens Road, Leigh.
Police arrived to find the trailer overturned.
Tony Ward, 48 - a member of the BNP - was hit on the head with a hammer. He was taken to hospital for treatment. Police said he was not seriously hurt.
A 25-year-old man was arrested on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm.
A spokesman for GMP said officers had been called after reports of a fight.
St Helens Road had been closed for about an hour and diversions put in place, he added.
The clashes came after the BNP was forced to cancel a meeting in the town at the last minute. The party had planned to hold an event in the Pure Club last night featuring a speech by leader Nick Griffin.
The most disturbing thing about the systematic campaign of intimidation and violence against lawful and peaceful BNP election campaigners, which led to the brutal attack on Tony Ward in Leigh yesterday, is that it is openly supported and encouraged by senior Labour and Tory MPs.
The violence is being organised by the Labour Party front group UAF (Unite Against Fascism). At least 57 MPs are named on the UAF’s website as sponsors, and supporters of its thuggery.
BNP Leader Nick Griffin has today challenged these MPs to condemn unequivocally last night’s attack and all other instances of violence and intimidation carried out by UAF thugs. “Many Establishment politicians have recently been demanding that Sinn Fein MPs should condemn the murderous violence perpetrated by dissident republicans”, said Mr Griffin. “But the truth is that Sinn Fein have less control and influence over groups such as the Real IRA than the Labour party in particular has over its close allies and ideological bedfellows in the UAF.
The liberal media often express concern about attacks by government-sponsored thugs in places like Zimbabwe, but there’s really no difference between that and what is happening here. Any establishment politicians who can look at the photograph of Tony Ward’s bloodied face and continue to sponsor the criminal gang responsible for the attack is quite simply inciting further violence.
The full list of MPs supporting the UAF and its undemocratic violence can be seen below:
Ken Livingstone
Tony Benn
Peter Hain MP
David Hanson MP
Adam Price MP
Barbara Follett MP
Diane Abbott MP
John Cryer MP
John Trickett MP
Keith Vaz MP
Peter Bottomley MP
Alice Mahon MP
Alan Meale MP
Ian Gibson MP
Sir Teddy Taylor MP
Harry Cohen MP
Betty Williams MP
Ken Purchase MP
Alistair Carmichael MP
Laura Moffatt MP
Peter Bradley MP
Vera Baird MP
Bill Etherington MP
Edward Garnier MP
Roger Berry MP
Angela Smith MP
Brian Iddon MP
Anthony Steen MP
Mike Hancock MP
Colin Pickthall MP
Clive Betts MP
Janet Anderson MP
Neil Gerrard MP
Jane Griffiths MP
Brian Donohue MP
Helen Clark MP
Terry Davis MP
Janet Dean MP
Adrian Bailey MP
David Cameron MP
Louise Ellman MP
Eric Illsley MP
Kelvin Hopkins MP
Ernie Ross MP
Rob Marris MP
Martin Caton MP
Jim Sheridan MP
Martin Jones MP
Paul Tyler MP
Colin Challen MP
David Wright MP
Rudi Vis MP
Tony Worthington MP
Derek Watts MP
Julie Morgan MP
Rev W Martin Smyth MP
Diana Organ MP
Doug Henderson MP
Barry Gardiner MP
John Taylor and Kieran Quinn have been conspiring with violent far left thugs to bring this kind of behaviour to the streets of Tameside. We have proof which can be produced when needed.
Dear Roy,
In any court you could prove your wife's distressing health problems and how she is dependant on your help and her health is being worsened by the threat of eviction, which is being exploited/harrasement by the numerous Labour Councillors who are involved with your housing trust.
The clear threat that your vote has increased every year and there is a strong possibility of you ousting the present Labour Cllr. It would appear that there is colusion with the other Labour Councillors.
It is clear that you and your family are being victimised and put under enormous stress. You are in fear of your wife health and safety. You may not have heard of this legal move that I am going to tell you about. Go to a Magistrates court as soon as possible and apply for what is known as a Magistrates Warrant on the grounds already stated. This does with away with any involvemt with solicitors. The Magistrates Warrant will be issued immediately. You know who the culprits are, have a warrant served on each one of them personally by your own hand. This will give them a week or two to attend court where they can be confronted and be forced to defend their actions.
Remember Roy attack is the best form of defence.
(xofpi=)
Dear anon, thanks for your sincere advice however there is a possible problem with your suggestion. Not only is New Charter infested with Labourites, Tameside court is also suffering an infestation. Two of the three Dukinfield ward (Roy West's ward) councillors are serving Magistrates at Roy's local court.
Advice please?
This is just the first section of quite a long interview with Roy West. The next sections feature the plea change mid-trial, Roy's views on his neighbours, his partners current state of health and the eviction proceedings started by Labour/New Charter. The next instalments will be uploded soon.
Dear Roy, better still because it will expose them leaving them wide open to a higher court only madmen would risk it under there conditions ,to much involvment on there part justice must appear to be done they wont risk it ,and of course there would be great expence in the long run to them plus a very bad advertisment of being dare i say crooks!!!(XofPi=)
All very amateurish - but how do we know that what Mr West is uttering, and what he plans to utter next, is the truth? As he is on record as being a liar and a racist, how can we ever believe what he says or what his motives are? If his concern for his partner is genuine, surely he should be concentrating on caring for her and not stirring up more hysteria through this silly blog. The rules of the tenancy are clear and were always there - it seems to me that he broke them, not his partner. But he will drag her down with him. I hope in the next election, West gets in so that the people that vote for him and express support for him, get exactly what they voted for. Seems to me like his gravy train ride is coming to an end. By the way, Glenmore Resident, wish you'd have brought your petition a bit further afield.
Above post whatever your thoughts on this matter it's prompted you to post. Maybe you could post a video in reply to his?
Keep digging Mr West the hole is getting bigger and bigger,I bet the people who want to evict you cant copy this stuff quick enough.
Logic is the study of the principles of valid demonstration and inference. Logic is a branch of philosophy, a part of the classical trivium. The word derives from Greek λογική (logike), fem. of λογικός (logikos), "possessed of reason, intellectual, dialectical, argumentative", from λόγος logos, "word, thought, idea, argument, account, reason, or principle
Hold on a minute, I thought the whole incident centred on Roy West attempting to attach a flag to his neighbour’s property? On this video the spot Mr West points to is definitely on his side of the Berlin Wall, this whole episode is turning into one of the most shameful events in Tameside’s recent history.
Roy how many times have I warned you of the criminal intent of your local political opponents? They do not believe they are breaking the law because they believe they ARE the law.
What a shite interview. Hey West, are you wearing make up?
"Shite" you may call it, but he certainly got his message across. If this whole affair is not politically orchestrated I would eat my hat. The video clearly shows that the flag was being erected on Roy West’s side of the divide and in his own garden.
Mr West how do you plead? "Guilty" case closed.
Bearing in mind the massive amount of human detritus that exist in New Charter properties many of whom have long criminal records who have had warning after warning after warning...can the most ardent West hater on here explain why they think this attempted eviction ISN'T politically motivated.
http://gidusko.webs.com/morris/
WELL WORTH HEARING THIS RADIO SHOW!!
http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2008/06/us-army-telegrams-confirm-jewish-role.html
To attempt to silence a man is to pay him homage, for it is an acknowledgement that his arguments are both impossible to answer and impossible to ignore." —JBR Yant
Bang on Mr Anonymous, NewLabour will resort to any methods they are allowed to get away with. After losing the 1992 election, and facing destruction Labour sold out their fundamentally flawed and outdated 'principles' to get re-elected at ALL costs. The alternative was to admit socialism had failed. They now believe in NOTHING. The only way to avoid confronting this void at their
core is to cling to power. They are concerned with nothing else and will do deals with ANYONE to gain votes and pursue ANY method no matter how detrimental to Britain's interests.
Racial hatred and intolerance must be and will crushed without mercy. West is lucky to have escaped so lightly.
Tameside afa, that sounds like one of Joe Stalin's proclamations, just before his thugs went out to indulge in a bit more 'justified' mass killing.
dealing with reality said...
Mr West how do you plead? "Guilty" case closed.
15/03/09 14:04
"Mr Kisko, how do you plead"...
"Birmingham six, how do you plead"...
"Judith ward,how do you plead"...
"Sally Clark, how do you plead"...
"Jean Charles de Menezes....how do you...... BANG! BANG! BANG!
you still trust the British legal system??
Anyone who opposes NewLabour is evil, fascist, morally inferior etc etc etc. When you've run out of arguments all that's left is namecalling and thuggery.
I thought the above all pleaded not guilty and kept their nerve in court.
Lets be honest about this he did do it and he does have a history of abusive behaviour.
It may not be a hanging offence but it does breach the tenancy agreement signed to get them this house.
All he had to do was keep his mouth shut having pleaded guilty and apologised, but no not this guy he could not wait to get on the blog and make thinks worse.
He knew his nieghbours would read it, I can remember the author of this blog warning people about this sort of thing,the victims in all this are his nieghbours not many come on here with any thought about them.
None of you would want to live next door to this man I can assure you he would find some reason to attack you.
When this all over no matter what the outcome don't you realise he will do the same again to someone,its his full time job.
Werneth Avenue Resident, you'd rather have the scum Mr West testified against living on your street would you? Don't pretend to be reasonable, you know he's had no previous warnings and was convicted of a minor offence and that New Charter have plenty of tenants who've committed far worse crimes and had multiple repeat warnings about behaviour and breaching their tenancy. Some of his blog comments may have been a bit daft but he's broken no laws so it's none of New Charter's business. My understanding is that the neighbour came out and confronted him when he was attempting to attach a flag to his own property which of course was none of his business and Mr West foolishly overreacted. You then make some totally unwarranted attack about what Mr West will do in the future, and you accuse HIM of making rash comments on this
site.
Just be honest and admit you don't like him and as such are incapable of being objective just like certain senior political figures in Tameside who pushed for his prosecution and are now pushing for his eviction.
Well done Roy your election looks more certain now than ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peiTfY7Bx4c&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2
Brussels 'Recreating Soviet Bloc in Europe'
'The leader of the Czech Republic, which holds the rotating European Union presidency, has warned that a "Europe of states" is in danger of turning into a "State of Europe", legislating on almost every aspect of people's lives but lacking in democracy and transparency.
In an interview with The Sunday Times, President Vaclav Klaus drew parallels between Brussels and the failed communist dictatorships of eastern Europe.'
Horst Mahler's Last
Public Statement
Horst Mahlers Vermächtnis
Horst Mahler's Legacy
Letzte Stellungnahme vor der Verhaftung vom 25.02.2009
His Last Statement Before Verdict and Imprisonment on 25 Feb. 2009
Translated from the German by J M Damon
3-23-9
I am sending this at the last moment.
After this I shall no longer have opportunity to address the public, so I am using this opportunity to briefly explain once more what is really at stake here.
I am now being sentenced and I shall be imprisoned immediately.
Many of my supporters disapprove of what I have done. They ask me: "Why are you doing this?"
{As part of the growing civil disobedience movement in Germany, Mahler had filed charges against himself for "Holocaust Denial."} Some of my supporters point out that I would be more effective on the outside than the inside of prison.
They say the government will now put me away and no benefit will come from it.
I explain to them that they are considering the matter from the wrong point of view.
The most important issue is no longer the fact that the present regime has taken away our right of free speech! This state has always had the power to do that, in any number of ways, regardless of whether one is expressing an opinion.. Something greater than the right to utter dissident remarks is at stake here.
If one realizes, as I do, that the "Holocaust" Religion is the principal weapon for the moral and cultural destruction of the German nation, then it is clear that what is at stake here is nothing less than the collective right of self-defense, that is, Germany's right to survive.
Survival affects everyone!
Does the world really believe that we Germans will unresistingly allow ourselves to be destroyed as a Volk, that we will passively allow our national spirit to be extinguished without a struggle?
What kind of jurists argue that self-defense is a criminal act?
As a Volk and a living collective entity we have a national and a spiritual nature.
The surest way to extinguish Germany as a spiritual entity is to destroy our national soul and identity, so that we no longer know who or what we are.
Destroying our national spirit is precisely the intent of our enemy in demanding that we unquestioningly accept his alien "Holocaust" dogma and desist from pointing out that his fantastic "Holocaust" never happened. There is no evidence of it!
Once we realize that we are faced with the threat of annihilation, we no longer have doubts about who our enemy is: it is the ancient murderer of nations.
Once we realize this, we no longer passively listen to the enemy's lies and misrepresentations. We look for a weapon and a way protect our Germany, to deprive the enemy of the power he has over us. Lo and behold, we have the only weapon we need to protect ourselves from annihilation. We have he truth.
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth!"
A rather unusual aspect of my life history is that I entered politics from the left of the political spectrum, by way of the Red Army Faction (RAF).
{Mahler's critics never tire of stressing this political transition, although the definitions of "left" and "right" have changed drastically in the last twenty-five years.
These critics would do well to consider Ralph Waldo Emerson's aphorism "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." A wise man learns new things as he goes through life and changes his ideas accordingly.} Briefly stated, the RAF took the path of armed struggle against "the System" as it was called in those days.
The idea that motivated us to take the path of armed struggle was our belief in "Holocaust." We actually believed what "the System" had taught us in school and what was constantly proclaimed in the enemy-controlled media. Like others in the RAF, I believed this anti German propaganda. As the American culture bringers say, "I bought it." I truly believed it as I sought a way to break out of the unbearable guilt complex associated with the "murder of six million Jews." I cannot go into the details of this period of my life here -- the point to be made is that I was a "true believer" in "Holocaust" when I was young.
In 2001, in the course of my career as attorney, I was asked to defend a musical patriot. This was the singer Frank Rennicke, who had been convicted and sentenced in the lower courts for "Holocaust Denial." My response to his request was: "Of course I will defend you!"
The task of defending Frank made it necessary for me to investigate all the facts, evidence and allegations connected with "Holocaust." This is what my investigations revealed: There is no supporting evidence for the fantastic allegations of "Holocaust!" There are only proclamations released by the victors' tribunal at Nuremberg to the effect that such an event occurred and was sufficiently "investigated." With his proverbial chutzpah our enemy tells us: "No other event in all history has been as thoroughly investigated as 'Holocaust.'" [The same chutzpah leads the enemy to claim that the huge amounts of insecticide Germany used to protect the health of internees during World War II were used to murder Jews!] If we examine the actual facts, we discover that it is all a lie.
It is atrocity propaganda that is still being disseminated, 65 years after Germany's defeat. When the servile Bundesgericht (German High Court) declares that a thousand "eyewitnesses" support the "proven event," it is another bald-faced lie!
Our so-called Bundesgericht (High Court) understands perfectly well that our so-called Bundesrepublik (Federal Republic) is not a sovereign state and therefore not a legitimate government. Prof. Carlo Schmid, the internationally recognized expert on international law and author of our Grundgesetz (Basic Law), stated clearly that the Federal Republic is not a valid state. In a speech he gave on the occasion of its creation in 1949, he specifically describes it as an "Organisationsform einer Modalität der Fremdherrschaft" (Organizational Form of a Modality of Foreign Rule), that is to say, a vehicle for domination by our enemies. Prof. Schmid invented composed this diplomatic expression to avoid using the term "puppet government." Our Basic Law was not written by a convention of elected representatives and it was not approved by plebiscite. Enemy occupiers imposed it on us and it does not meet the prerequisites for a legitimate state. Since the Federal Republic is not a legitimate state, the institutions and stipulations that our enemiues forced upon us are likewise not legitimate under international law.
It is clear that the victors or victor of World War II (the only real victor was world Jewry) took great pains to assure that the basis for Jewish domination, namely the religious cult of "Holocaust," would be legalistically unassailable. This was their intent when they created the Federal Republic, and it is clear that the High Court long ago adopted a judicature designed to perpetuate "Holocaust." The mission to protect "Holocaust" lies at the heart of both the Federal Republic and the Basic Law. This is the basis of Germany's domination by its enemies.
Germany's foreign minister Joschka Fischer explained this very clearly when he referred to "Holocaust" and sponsorship of Israel as the raison d'etre of the Federal Republic.
What is happening now is nothing other than the destruction of the moral foundation of our Volk through genocidal assault on our national soul. There is nothing surprising about this.
We would have to consider our enemies really stupid, especially our most powerful and dangerous enemy, if he did not take decisive measures to maintain domination over us. Our enemies did not launch World War II against us in order to abandon their war aims after the inevitable victory of their overpowering resources of numbers and materiel. They went to great lengths to avoid giving us the possibility of exonerating ourselves ourselves from the Great Lie through authentic trials conducted by a professional and independent judiciary. Our greatest enemy is not stupid!
He took painstaking precautions, and he is all too familiar with elaborate methods to assure compliance with his peculiar brand of "justice."
No one who perceives that our enemy is still perpetrating genocide against us as part of his war aims can expect a German to obey the proscription against questioning "Holocaust." No one can expect that a German who wants to be German will not object to this assault against our nation. This assault is nothing less than cultural genocide, and it threatens us all.
If possible, I ask you to dare to imagine what necessarily follows from this, if it is really the case. What a wretched excuse for a human being I would be if I, knowing of this threat to our nation in all its implications, would keep quiet and sink back in my easy chair and just wait for the day when the truth would come to light of its own accord! Every German has an obligation to do his duty to the Fatherland!
We have a right and sacred to defend ourselves, to preserve our nation and our Volk! In every civilized country, there is a legal obligation to come to the aid of those who are in danger. In fact, the law prescribes punishments for those who fail to render aid.
Failure to assist and render aid is a serious violation of law; it constitutes a corpus delicti in itself. I would be guilty of a serious crime if I failed to render aid to my Volk - if I kept quiet and failed to come to its aid, knowing that the monstrous fraud called "Holocaust" did not really occur. In that case, I would be a truly depraved criminal!.
In the present situation, it would be pointless for me to plod along and attempt to gain a majority in this or that political party, or to found a new and independent party that would somehow make its way through our corrupt and labyrinthine parliament to repeal genocidal anti-German laws. Working alone, my only course of action is to continue doing what I have done. Relying on myself alone, I can do nothing except repeat the truth over and over again. I have sworn a sacred oath that can be read on the Internet, our only source of uncensored information, that I will never desist from repeating this truth: "Holocaust" is a lie, and so is the claim that it has been "proven." There is no supporting evidence.
In his undaunted defense of the Christian faith, the traditionalist Bishop Richard Williamson recently stated the same truth that I discovered long ago.
In the Rennicke case I was professionally obligated to investigate the evidence of "Holocaust" and it turned out that no such evidence exists. After reviewing several similar trials, we were able to produce a letter written by a professor of contemporary history, Prof. Gerhard Jagschitz of Vienna, whose research had also led to the conclusion that there is no evidence to support "Holocaust." When I contacted him he said: "Yes, of course, we already know that." Prof. Jagschitz had been commissioned by the court as an expert witness to determine whether "Holocaust" is "manifestly obvious" as an actual event of contemporary history. He spent three years researching all the available literature concerning "Holocaust" in order to determine the actual truth. After these three years he informed the court that he could no longer defend his original assumption in support of the validity of "Holocaust." He arrived at the emphatic conclusion that, within the guidelines of a society of laws, it is not permissible to use the "manifest self-evidence" of "Holocaust" as a basis for sentencing those found guilty of questioning it. In those days it was Prof. Jagschitz and now it is Bishop Williamson, and soon there will be many other prominent persons who arrive at this same conclusion.
Self-defense is an inalienable right. As a German who wants to be German I am personally affected by this assault against my Volk. The German nation is not only entitled to defend itself, it is in fact obligated to defend itself. Because of our cultural substance, we as a nation in central Europe have the duty and obligation to resist attempts to destroy us culturally, to annihilate us as a Volk and a spiritual entity. This is what is at stake! I do not choose to wait for others to defend the German nation - I choose to do it myself! I am telling the truth as I perceive it, and the truth is that the so-called "Holocaust" never happened. That is the obvious reason why there is no evidence of it! There is nothing to support "Holocaust" except the verdicts of Moscow type show trials. These verdicts are constantly hammered into our heads by the Jewish media as "proof" that "Holocaust" was real and that there is an abundance of evidence to support it.
Those who enforces and perpetuate this blood libel is guilty of treason against the German nation. Most notorious among these traitors are the judges of the High Court, who sanctify and reinforce the decisions of the lower courts concerning the absurd "manifest obviousness" of "Holocaust." This is worse than merely perverting justice -- it is carrying out deliberate genocide against the German people. I have proven the guilt of the robed traitors in Karlsruhe numerous times and I shall continue to stress this even while in prison.
I am facing twelve years' imprisonment. How willl it all end? I am 73 years old, and so this is a life sentence for me. My sentence proves that in Germany today, life imprisonment can be imposed for anyone who refuses do obeisance to the Great Lie. The Jews, of course, are always willing to "bargain." First the dissident is lightly punished, perhaps with just a fine. Or there can be a prison sentence of just a few months, which can be probated. One always has a chance of getting off easily by kowtowing to the Great Lie and giving assurances that there will be no more difficulties in future. This is precisely what the enemy wants.
Anyone who is convinced that life under the Great Lie is not worth living must be kept behind bars forever. Since I have openly expressed this sentiment countless times, knowing full well that the cudgel would fall, the enemy will most assuredly keep me in prison for the rest of my life. The enemy must demonstrate to the cowed public what is really at stake here! Obviously we Germans are now in a situation in which we must rot away our entire lives if we do not submit to the Great Lie. Whatever happens to me I can only say, as our Savior says in the Evangel of St. Matthew: "Whoever is not willing to take up his cross is not worthy of me!"
We are not worthy to call ourselves Germans if we do not stand up for the truth, but unresistingly submit to the Great Lie!
However, I am confident that Germany's historic plight is about to change.
The struggle over the authenticity of "Holocaust" and dominance of "Holocaust" dogma is now raging within the Catholic Church. The Church is still a great power, even though its leadership has been corrupted and undermined by the Jews. With its great wealth and hundreds of millions of faithful followers, the Church is the rock on which the ship of the Great Lie will crash and perish.
The Jews are about to experience their Waterloo.
Once "Holocaust" is openly discussed, knowledge of its true nature can no longer be suppressed. When the Bishop Williamson affair reaches the point at which a sitting pope is forced to again excommunicate him, as the head of ADL (Anti Defamation League: the fighting organization of world Jewry) demands; or if, under pressure of the Jewish media and corrupt politicians, Pope Benedict XVI abdicates the Throne of Peter, this will be an excruciating shock for the Catholic world, and the truth will break through on this account! Christian faith is based on the Truth, the Rock of Ages.
The Truth will make us free and the will to be free will grow stronger until it is irresistible, and then we will prevail. As for me, I have done everything I could do. I have set an example.
I have often said that ours is the easiest revolution that was ever carried out. We need only for a few thousand persons to rise up and speak the truth as clearly and openly as Bishop Williamson has done and I have attempted to do, along with the others who have filed legal complaints against themselves for telling the truth and distributing Germar Rudolf's "Lectures on the Holocaust."
The ultimate victory of the truth is inevitable, as is the defeat of the global Zionist Empire. However, we have no way of knowing how much more time must pass, or the exact circumstances that will usher in the victory of the truth. We have to wait and see.
At present we are witnessing another collapse of the global Jewish financial system. The Jewish power base, the temple of their god JahwehMammon, has been struck in the heart by the collapse of their predatory banking system. Jewish power is based on money power, which buys them control of the politicians and media. At present they are losing this money power.
Once they lose it, they also lose control of government and public opinion. Their control of public opinion has already been weakened by the rise of the uncensored Internet, which they are unable suppress. When they lose control of the media, they will be in a pitiable condition indeed!
When that happens, the Jews will be grateful that we understand and accept their historic role in world redemption. We recognize their destructive tyranny as a revelation of the path of God through the world to Himself, as the philosopher Hegel explained. We respect the Jews as the followers of Satan and we accept them in the certainty that we can redeem them as well as ourselves, by bringing the Truth into the world through our deeds. The Jews are in dire need of redemption, and they will one day be grateful to us!
****************
Here's freedom to him who would speak, Here's freedom to him who would write; For there's none ever feared that the truth should be heard, Save him whom the truth would indict! ROBERT BURNS (175996)
WELL WORTH UNDERSTANDING!
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Australia to fine its residents $11,000 for visiting 10,000 politically incorrect websites
Perhaps the Aussie's should have been a bit more verbal a decade ago when their government started fining and persecuting those that questioned certain aspects of history associated with the holocaust lie? Please note that the below article, which doesn't condemn the Australian governments censorship in any way, was written by a Jew.
The decision to ban George Galloway from Canada seems odd, but now it emerges that the Jewish Defence League (JDL) pressured the Canadian Government to do so. The action takes on sinister connotations for Canada, why? Because the Jewish Defence League are according to the FBI a Terrorist Group. In its report, Terrorism 2000/2001, the FBI referred to the JDL as a “violent extremist Jewish organization”. This “violent extremist Jewish organization” now it seems has power and influence over the Canadian Government.
Canadians are just waking up to the fact that Israel controls their government just as much as it does the USA. And note that inevitably, the Israeli shill has to fall back on the Holocaust to try to bludgeon his way through Galloway’s arguments. The good point is watching the Israeli whore thrashing around and clearly aware that he is losing the war for legitimacy in the public eye.]
Here are some frightening statistics that a friend just emailed to me, Off topic but I thought worth a mention.
"Nearly the entire population of earth are Asian, Nearly all the rest are black, A small percentage are white.
There is only one minority group on earth, Us the white folks and we are the only group that is openly discriminated against in every country of the world'.
It seems that in global terms we are already the Diminitude.
The Green Crescent madrassa, in Bangladesh: Police claim it is a militant training camp
It has emerged that the father-of-three was also given a suspended sentence for trying to board a plane with a pistol in his suitcase last year.
The Charity Commission said tonight it was investigating the allegations, which it said it was taking very seriously.
On Monday Bangladeshi security forces raided the orphanage and attached Muslim school on the remote island of Bhola in South Bangladesh.
They discovered explosives to make 'several hundred' grenades, as well as ammunition, remote control devices and radical Islamic books.
A teacher and three caretakers have been arrested but Mostafa, who is in his mid-40s, is being searched for in Bangladesh.
Lt Col Munir Haque, an officer involved in the operation by the Rapid Action Battalion, said: 'We found small arms – about nine or 10 in total – plus equipment to make small arms, about 3,000 rounds of ammunition, two walkie-talkies, two remote control devices and four sets of army uniforms.
'We also found enough explosives and other equipment to make several hundred grenades. We found some ordinary Islamic books, but others that are in line with extremists like Bin Laden.'
He said that there were about 11 children between the ages of 7 and 8 at the compound at the time of the raid, but no other adults.
K M Mamunur Rashid, another officer involved in the raid, said: 'It is a big madrassa and we have so far gathered that this whole compound is being used for militant training,' he said.
He added that the charity had plans to build two more madrassas, viewed by the authorities as recruiting grounds for militant groups.
Mostafa, who has a PhD in chemistry from Manchester Polytechnic, was cleared of conspiracy to cause explosions with intent to endanger life at Birmingham Crown Court in 2002.
He was working as a teacher at a Birmingham mosque when MI5 agents swooped on a flat where they discovered bin liners containing chemicals, electronic devices and gloves with traces of HMTD, a high explosive.
Mostafa denied involvement with any terror organisation and told the jury that chemicals and explosive materials were intended to make fireworks.
His co-accused, Moinul Abedin, was jailed for 20 years after being found guilty of planning to cause explosions around the UK.
In 1996, Mostafa had been cleared at Manchester Crown Court of involvement in a terrorist bomb plot campaign with two other students after explosives were found at his home.
But he was found guilty of illegally possessing a firearm, sentenced to four years in prison and banned for life from possessing a firearm.
In July last year he was caught trying to board a plane to Bangladesh with a gas-powered pistol and bullet parts in his luggage.
He was arrested at Manchester Airport by security officials and claimed the gun was a gift for his brother, as part of a hunting and fishing trip with his wife and three children.
The charge carried a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment but Mostafa was sentenced to 56 days in prison, suspended for two years, and 100 hours' community service.
According to its website, the Green Crescent charity was set up by students in 1998, with the motto, 'Individuals with vision are capable of changing society in a positive way'.
Last year it had an income of £63,000 for 'long-term educational and health projects'.
The Charity Commission, which awarded Green Crescent charity status in 2004, last night came under fire from partner organisations in shock about Dr Mostafa's record.
Saeed Mahmood, of the Stockport-based charity Human Appeal International, said: 'Faisal comes in every few months about mainland projects in Bangladesh. We only work with organisations that are registered with the Charity Commission so we had no idea about these allegations.
'I'm taken aback. The Charity Commission should have told us if they knew and if they didn't know, why not?'
A spokesman from counter-terrorism think-tank the Quilliam Foundation added: 'If the Green Crescent charity has indeed been involved in militant activity, this will reflect very poorly on the Charity Commission, particularly given that Mostafa, the head of the charity, had previously been put on trial twice for terrorist offences.
'Ineffectiveness by the Charity Commission in identifying and tackling extremist charities leads to the British taxpayer directly subsiding militancy and extremism.'
Andrew Hind, Chief Executive of the Charity Commission said: 'We are working with relevant law enforcement and other agencies to investigate the allegation that terrorist activity is connected with the charity. The matter is of serious concern to us, and we are taking this action given the gravity of the matter, the public interest and the need to protect charity work and funds.
'We intend, as is normal procedure, to publish a statement of the results of the inquiry setting out our findings once the inquiry is completed.'
Usury Remains Untouched
Jim Kirwan.
"We [have] dismantled the most ancient of human laws, the law against usury, which had existed in some form in every civilization from the time of the Babylonian Empire to the end of Jimmy Carter's term." From: Infinite Debt, Harpers' Magazine - How Unlimited Interest Rates Destroyed the Economy." By Thomas Geoghegan
THOMAS GEOGHEGAN: In the article, that appeared in Harper's, I've talked about the fact that we've not focused enough on the big deregulation that precedes all other deregulations, and that's the ceiling that has existed on the financial sector since time immemorial on the amount of interest that banks can get from their clients, their customers, their depositors. Historically, and even up through movies like It's a Wonderful Life with Frank Capra and Mr. Potter and George Bailey, the interest rates in this country were capped at eight percent, nine percent. In the 1970s, we began to deregulate this, and then we had a massive big bang with a Supreme Court case that effectively knocked out all the interest rate caps. And we have today, taken as common, that banks can charge 17, 18, 19, 30, 35 percent, not to mention payday lenders charging 200, 300, 400 percent in states like Illinois, California."
"If you're able to charge 30 percent or, in a payday lender case, 200 or 300 percent, you don't care so much if the loan-in fact, you actually want the loan not to be repaid. You want people to go into debt. You want to accumulate this interest. And this addicted the financial sector to very, very, very high rates of return compared to what investors were used to getting in the real economy, the manufacturing sector, General Motors, which would give piddling five, six, seven percent returns.
So the capital in this country began to shift in the financial sector. That's why the financial sector began to bloat up. That's why we ended up, by 2006, having a third of all profits going into the banks and the financial firms and not into the real economy." (1)
?These cords of dynamite that blew the lid off interest caps; have taken away our freedoms and insured that, like our money, our financial options have nearly been destroyed. This all began with the appointment of Gerald R. Ford and the 25th Amendment that made his administration possible. Ford did a lot more than just officially pardon Nixon: because he also appointed Rockefeller as his VP, who was able to quietly connect all those secret decisions that linked corporate banking to the military-congressional-industrial-complex; which opened the way for the formal creation of the New World Order, and simultaneously unplugged the public from any role in this entire travesty, as depicted in the 1974 illustration above.
The recent changes in the Bankruptcy laws, penalize individuals far beyond what most people can afford: while at the same time Congress liberalized the Business Bankruptcy Laws to the point where when a business goes bankrupt today; this amounts to taking a brief shower that allows them to shed all of their most painful obligations while retaining all their assets. In other words; Bankruptcy for Businesses is the exact opposite of what happens to individuals, when they are forced into personal Bankruptcy. And it is this form of bankruptcy that awaits the automotive industry, and probably almost every major corporation that still has labor contracts or social obligations to their employees, such as retirement accounts, or medical guarantees. So when you hear about how dire things will be if one or more of our major industries is about to be forced into bankruptcy, you might want to run it through this simple lense-before deciding as to "what will be lost."
The 'Bankruptcy Card' now belongs completely to the owners, just like their "get-out-of-jail-free" Card. There are so many different facets to their use and abuse of Usury that it literally boggles the mind. But then that is why 'Usury Laws have existed in some form in every civilization from the time of the Babylonian Empire,' except for now, under the watchful eye of the Illuminati and the New World Order.
For instance; 'the problem' that Obama and Geithner supposedly addressed was "toxic housing stocks" when the real problem is still "toxic banks, and their thoroughly criminal practices and procedures. By the end of January of this year the FED had already dispensed $11.5 Trillion to the shadow government of this country-yet MSM is currently claiming that only $4 Trillion plus has been allocated thus far (about a third of the actual amount). Until government begins to level with the public this monstrosity will only get bigger because the real causes of all our problems are in the details of everything they say they're doing; and are not mentioned in any of the endless press conferences that Obama continues to give. (2)
Yesterday's announcement offered this "deal" to the taxpayers. 'We put up 94% of the investment while the private financial institutions put up 6% of the investment: Then we and the "vulture capitalists" each get 50% of the profits, if there are any. This is the brilliant plan that Geithner and Obama would not reveal the details of, the first time they tried to force this down our throats. Yesterday was a re-run, nothing new, except that this time they were comfortable with telling us about this, as they were certain that none of the idiots in the public would understand what is really going on.
There are no real changes in the way that bonuses are paid either, except for AIG. They failed to mention this part of that deal as well. The changes only apply to AIG, and not to any of the other obscene bailouts or the outrageous bonuses paid to their executives-because as usual they haven't fixed the system: They have only tinkered with one instance of 'a problem' that managed to seriously anger a great many people. What happens when and IF the public ever learns the truth about the entire monetary collapse that is continuing without interruption in the real world? I'd love to hear about what happened to that $11.5 Trillion (as of 1-31-09) that has since been added to, no doubt: How about you, aren't you even curious?
There is a 'solution' floating around out there in the shadows: it's called the 28th Amendment and could, if enacted, eliminate the corporate personhood status, that has caused all this criminality to have such a hugely successful run through this lawless place that it has structured, since that travesty was successfully created out of the 14th Amendment.
The 14th Amendment was used by the corporations to acquire personhood. But the 14th Amendment was intended to protect the then recently-freed African-American slaves from racism-just one more example of the strong-arm legal tactics used to alter this Republic and turn it into just another fiefdom of, by and for, the Super-rich! (3)
If we do not begin to protect ourselves from this government, then we shall become the new slaves that the Illuminati and the New World Order were formed to create here, in the first place.
kirwanstudios@sbcglobal.net
1) Thomas Geoghegan on "Infinite Debt: How Unlimited Interest Rates Destroyed the Economy" - video & partial transcript http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/24/thomas_geoghegan_on_infinite_debt_how
2) Delusion & Denial http://www.kirwanesque.com/politics/articles/2009/art17.htm
3) Proposed Amendment to Article 28 http://www.realdemocracy.com/28web.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94lW6Y4tBXs&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2
A GOOD WATCH!
Above post why don't you just put URL FOR THE LINK?
INFORMATION COMING THROUGH THE GRAPEVINE ERIC THE FISH THE LEFT WING KIPPER HAS BEEN DENOUNCING THE BNP VIA THE STINKY PHILLIPS RADIO SHOW TODAY. BOTH STINKY AND FISHY HAVE BEEN VISITING THE BNP WEBSITES. THEY ARE UPSET WITH THE COMMON PURPOSE VIDEO THIS IS TO BE DISCUSSED IN TOMORROWS (27TH MARCH) RADIO PROGRAMME ON RADIO MESERYSIDE BETWEEN 12 AND 2PM. THIS DESERVES OUR ATTENTION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HvkldPJZZC0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fisupporttheresistance%2Eblogspot%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_embedded
WATCH AND PASS ON.
Dear Friends,
As a vicar I cannot identify openly with any patriotic parties for fear of losing my position - unfortunately the multi-racialists and liberals have too much influence in the Church of England. As a Christian patriot I believe that immigration should be ended and non-white immigrants encouraged through financial incentives to repatriate back to their homelands of ancestral origin. In the Holy Bible we read what will happen if this is not carried out; race hatred, racial violence and race riots will blight our land.
Whether you consider the issue from a secular or Biblical perspective, all "humans" do not share a common ancestry. The idea that all humans are "family" is a lie propagated by the ruling Jewish Establishment and the apostate "Judeo-Christian" churches -- and supported by the fraudulent theory of evolution -- which serves as a basis for the "multicultural", race-mixing, and "one world community" agenda that is designed to destroy the white race through mongrelization and absorption with the non-white races.
Biologically and scientifically speaking, how is it possible for the pure-blooded black, asian, and white races to have descended from Adam and Eve, Noah and his wife, or any other common ancestor? Could Adam and Eve reproduce and have black, white, and asian children? Of course not. That's biologically impossible.
The black, white, and asian races -- in their pure-blooded states, absent any mixing among the races -- are of completely different lineage. They were created separately, and are essentially different species of "humans." The fact that separate races can interbreed (and produce hybrid species) is not proof of common origin or common species, as this phenomenon exists among other animals -- eg, lion and tiger can mate and produce a hybrid "liger", horse and donkey to produce mule, etc.
http://www.holocaustdenialvideos.com/
Police identify 200 children as potential terrorists
Drastic new tactics to prevent school pupils as young as 13 falling into extremism
Two hundred schoolchildren in Britain, some as young as 13, have been identified as potential terrorists by a police scheme that aims to spot youngsters who are "vulnerable" to Islamic radicalisation.
The number was revealed to The Independent by Sir Norman Bettison, the chief constable of West Yorkshire Police and Britain's most senior officer in charge of terror prevention.
He said the "Channel project" had intervened in the cases of at least 200 children who were thought to be at risk of extremism, since it began 18 months ago. The number has leapt from 10 children identified by June 2008.
Greek Jews 'shocked' after Holocaust denier is acquitted by Athens Appeals court
According to Moses Constantinis (R), president of the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece, the prosecutor characterized Plevris’s defamatory book – which denies the Holocaust, calls the Jews “sub-human” and threatens them with the “re-opening of the crematoria in Auschwitz- a “scientific work”.
ATHENS (EJP)---The Greek Jewish community said Friday it was “shocked” after neo-Nazi militant Kostas Plevris, who wrote a book denying the Holocaust and containing offensive references to Jews, was acquitted by an Appeals court in Athens.
Plevris was found not guilty of “incitement to racial hatred and violence against the Jews” by the 5-member court.
In a reaction, the Central Board of Jewish Communities in Greece (KIS) expressed its “disappointment and amazement at the decision of the Athens court.
"This decision saddens and causes concern among citizens of a modern democratic society as a self-confessed advocate of Nazism and racism remains unpunished though he not only distorts proven historical evidence, but even worse, uses his pen to incite hatred and provoke discrimination and violence against citizens of Greece and Europe," the Central Board said.
“The Greek Jewry believes that the fundamental constitutional right of freedom of speech has nothing to do with the direct threats, insults and incitement to racial hatred and violence against the Jews that Plevris includes in his book" titled “Jews-The whole truth” .
Plevris had been convicted in first instance in December 2007 and condemned to 14 months of imprisonment on probation for three years for “racial insult”, “incitement to hatred and racial violence” on the basis of the 1979 anti-racist law.
At the time, the Jewish community saw the trial as a key test of the Greek authorities’ determination to deal with anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial in a country where anti-Semitic literature such as the infamous “Protocols of the elders of Zion” is on sale in bookshops.
The charges against Plevris were also brought by the Helsinki Monitor and the “Anti-Nazi Initiative” organization, two human right Greek NGO’s.
He immediately appealed the sentence.
According to Moses Constantinis, the Appeals court prosecutor characterized Plevris’s defamatory book – which denies the Holocaust, calls the Jews “sub-human” and threatens them with the “re-opening of the crematoria in Auschwitz- a “scientific work”.
To express the resentment of the Greek Jews, the Jewish umbrella body has decided not to be represented at the European symposium “Building together the Future of Europe” which will be held next Monday in Brussels, “given that theoretical analysis and statements made by Greek MEPs on the denunciation and condemnation of anti-Semitism are meaningless”.
BBC EXPOSED YET AGAIN!!
CP BBC Merseyside Radio biased interview with Brian Gerrish (see full archive article) (02/04/2009)
BBC and Media
So rattled is Common Purpose by the steady leak of information revealing its political agenda and huge fees taken from the taxpayer, that they have now apparently enlisted the BBC to manage their tawdry image. Brian Gerrish was recently invited to speak concerning CP on BBC Radio Mersyside on Friday 27 March 2009 after the Presenter Roger Phillips linked his name with the BNP. Mr Phillips claimed that he was only able to find material by Brian Gerrish on the BNP's website. This is despite the fact that a single entry of the name Brian Gerrish in Google produces hundreds of linked articles and talks. Brian complained at the BBC bias and was quickly invited onto the Friday lunchtime show apparently to star the local Liverpool Common Purpose Director Ken Pye.
On the day, and not surprisingly, Mr Pye was 'unable' to appear. This left Roger Phillips to attempt to discredit Brian Gerrish. Normal tactics were used including suggestions of 'conspiracy theory', BNP and claims that Common Purpose was 'suffering' under Freedom of Information requests from the public. But why was Mr Phillips so keen to defend and support Common Purpose?
Aside from the fact that hundreds of BBC senior staff have been Common Purpose trained at £3950 plus VAT each (see BBC and media Archive of this site), Mr Phillips is a regular participant in Liverpool Common Purpose net-working events, alongside none other than Mr Ken Pye. Using license payers money on air Mr Phillips was happy to make claims trying to highlight the honesty and probity of Common Purpose although he had no documents or evidence to support his claims. Phillips apparently made further supportive claims for Common purpose after Brian Gerrish had left the show. Is this what the BBC is for...Common Purpose advertising? Mr Phillips had also failed to look at any of the documentary evidence on this site. So the interview was again biased. Welcome to Common Purpose control of the media. The interview will be posted on this site shortly. See the BBC Media Archive section on cpexposed.com for a copy of a Phillips / Pye Common Purpose event.
WORLD WAR 3
Apart from death, competition is the most inescapable fact of life .
And competition is fundamentally about survival in an over-populated world with finite resources. This competition takes many forms, ranging from the violent interactions of the natural world through warfare and commercial rivalries to the most subtle connivings for social advancement. Also, the predatory and parasitical tactics for survival we see in the animal world have their counterparts in human society, although frequently disguised and of a more insidious nature. The predatory animal can only survive by consuming other creatures; thus its prey is assimilated into its own life. In human society the predation operates at the psychological level , in the competition for power, influence and ‘a place in the world’ . Our selfhood is engaged in a constant war of survival amongst other selfhoods no less inclined to be self-assertive. The more predatory , that is to say egotistical selves expand their own place in the world by, as it were, consuming other selves. It’s a kind of social theatre, a stage crowded with people contending for the star roles and where the less assertive or advantaged are upstaged and marginalised as anonymous ‘extras’ . We are seeing this today in the so-called ‘celebrity’ culture, where certain individuals are described as such simply for having a sizeable following in such fields as fashion, popular entertainment, sport, politics, literature, industry and art. The ‘fans’ of such people are the prey of their ‘celebrities’. They have, in a manner of speaking, been consumed, in that their own identities have been diminished and perhaps nearly extinguished by that of the person ‘celebrated’ . We see this most vividly in popular entertainment, with its ‘stars’ and tumultuous ‘fans’ sacrificing their own individuality on the altar of their idol.. In the political sphere it is the ‘front benchers’ hogging the limelight and calling the tune, with a largely unimpressive motley in the background; irresistibly reminding us of the Gilbert&Sullivan musical comedy ‘where everybody’s somebody and no one’s anybody’ .
Of course everybody wants to be ‘somebody’. Much of the anxiety and neurosis affecting modern society has to do with a feeling of lost personal significance, of being merged into faceless and futile anonymity by some bureaucracy or regime . Almost any stage-managed ego-trip is therefore bound to attract people hoping the self-assertion will be infectious enough to invest their own lives with some meaning. But more often than not the hope is unfulfilled ; the excitement fades, and the more perceptive finally realise they have simply enhanced somebody else’s selfhood at the expense of their own.
The ‘enlisters’ are always with us. A conspicuous example in our so-called ‘multicultural’ society is the Muslim immigrant , whose own sense of identity is chained to a long ago desert prophet, even to the extent of adopting the same name. Detached from his prophet’s identity the individual Muslim is socially and culturally floundering, his selfhood dissolved. And of course the self-abasement he’s obliged to exhibit at prayer meetings emphasises his own feeling of insignificance. Devotees of this religion in particular are obliged to discard anything resembling personal freedom of thought and action as the price of salvation ; they must cease to be authentic individuals except in the most superficial respects. But they are not alone in this compulsion to affirm and perhaps enhance personal selfhood by identifying with some charismatic figure or prestigious group; hence Marxists, Buddhists, Maoists, Keynesians,
‘Common Purpose’ nuts, Stalinists and such. In all such cases the price of membership is diminution of personal choice and judgement ; subordination to somebody else’s assertiveness , principles and values.
To be sure this may even be advantageous to some otherwise disorientated or alienated individuals. But the authentic individual embodies a much more robust selfhood, capable of holding its own against all the intimidatory pressures of officialdom, the mass media, advertisers, commercial, political, religious and other agencies seeking to subordinate and enlist one’s identity to their own advantage.
This can never be easy, and such individuals are apt to experience quite a lot of personal differences, suspicion, pressures to conform and moments of self-doubt in some circumstances. Even so, they retain a sturdy selfhood in exercising freedom of thought and choice , always too large, complex and independent for any bureaucratic questionnaire , market researcher or ideologue. They are not easily and conveniently pigeonholed, labelled or enlisted by those seeking to expand and impose their own selfhood, however well-disguised as altruistic philanthropists.
You will have noticed that most people are much more interested in discovering what you are than who you are., since that tends to govern their reaction to you . That you are called William Bloggs is a matter of supreme indifference to all except close relatives ; but how different the reactions if you are introduced as Sir, Doctor, Professor, the Reverend, Colonel, Judge, Chairman, for example ! In mischievous mode with a couple friends I made such social experiments many years ago. Introduced at different parties as a psychoanalyst, psychic researcher, Detective Inspector, company director, stockbroker or journalist, one learned much about social psychology very quickly, though of course careful to avoid any harm to those involved in this light-hearted deception.
But rugged individuality is anathema to the kind of control freaks we have in government these days . The only identity they want you to have is the one they think necessary to fit their totalitarian mould. Without toting an official card and serial number from womb to tomb you will be what the Communists called a non-person. And according to them the most conspicuous alien becomes ‘as British as anybody else’ by ticking a few boxes and reciting a few words to a Home Office plonker before dashing off to collect social services benefits.
As justifiably proud but not arrogant members of the most accomplished race and nation on the planet, we owe no apologies and don’t much care what other races and nations think about us. With centuries of closer social and cultural integration than you can find anywhere else in the world, we don’t need immigrant whinges about integration, Marxist pseudo-comrades, or black bishops lecturing us about the brotherhood of man while their blood relatives are being slaughtered by the tens of thousands back in Africa). No black, Asian or other alien is capable of representing the interests of the British people in any capacity whatsoever, though such might occasionally be hired on a temporary basis to serve British purposes. Every inch of British soil belongs to the British people and no one else ; and we are not bound by any laws made by people not elected by or accountable directly to us. And where such illicit laws are applied, we reserve the inalienable right to ignore , frustrate and subvert them at every opportunity. The fact that this government condemns us for this patriotic stand makes its own perfidy all the more conspicuous. In short, we know well enough who and what we are and are as content with it until we ourselves see fit to make changes..
Meanwhile anybody who looks like an alien, talks like an alien and acts like an alien is always going to be seen as an alien by all the natives of our own happy breed. So if you meet anyone contending otherwise, just spit in their eye.
F Kimbal Johnson
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19805
WATCH.
EU trains a new diplomatic corps - without waiting for Lisbon Treaty
The European Union was accused of "contempt for democracy" on Sunday after it emerged that hundreds of members of a new diplomatic service are being trained - even though the Lisbon Treaty that creates it has not come into effect.
By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels
Last Updated: 3:05PM BST 12 Apr 2009
Five hundred and thirty staff from the European Commission have already begun training to build a "shared diplomatic culture and an esprit de corps" for the EU's putative External Action Service (EEAS).
Irish voters blocked the Lisbon Treaty, which provides the legal basis for a new Euro-diplomatic corps, when they rejected the renamed EU Constitution in a referendum last June.
Related Articles
European Commission may extend term to see through stalled Lisbon treaty
Czechs 'have obligation' to pass Lisbon Treaty despite government's collapse
William Hague interview: Gordon Brown could be forced into European referendum
Caroline Flint, Europe minister, hasn't read Lisbon Treaty
Forget the G20 mob, coping-class fury is about to reach boiling pointThe disclosure that the Commission has simply pressed on regardless and begun training the euro-diplomats infuriated Irish politicians. Ireland is expected to hold a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty in October.
Declan Ganley, an Irish campaigner for a "No" vote, said: "It is cause for serious concern that, by implementing the Lisbon Treaty, EU institutions are manifesting outright contempt for democracy."
Privately, EU officials are aware of the sensitivity of going ahead with training a euro-diplomatic corps. "We are trying to push the envelope as far as we can within the current environment," said one official in "European Voice", a Brussels weekly.
Staff are being discreetly trained, "without being too obvious", on 59 courses with the help of foreign ministries from 17 member states, according to EU sources.
The training aims to foster a "specifically European dimension of diplomacy" and to "create a sense of common European purpose" for the new service. Ireland is one of four EU member states - the others are Poland, the Czech Republic and Germany - which have yet to ratify the Lisbon Treaty. Under the EU's founding rules, no treaty of this kind can come into effect without the unanimous approval of all member states.
The Conservatives demanded to know whether the Foreign Office was among the national governments aiding the training courses. Mark Francois, the Conservative spokesman on the EU, said: "This project shows just how much more power Brussels would gain over our foreign policy. It is outrageous that the British people are being denied any say over it. That's why the Conservatives will be campaigning for a referendum in the European elections."
Secret negotiations, revealed last year by The Daily Telegraph, have agreed that the EEAS will take over the EU's existing representative offices - there are currently more than 160 across the world - which will be granted the same legal diplomatic status as national embassies.
The new EU service will rival established national diplomatic corps. Britain, with one of the world's largest diplomatic services, maintains 139 Embassies and High Commissions. Britain narrowly blocked a proposal to call the EU's representative offices the "Embassies of the Union" during secret talks last spring.
The EEAS will be overseen by a new European "foreign minister", renamed the "High Representative of the Union". If Ireland's voters approve the Lisbon Treaty in a second referendum, this official will be selected, along with a new EU president, at a summit in December.
Privately, officials are concerned that disclosure of the EU's pre-emptive moves could sway Irish voters and make a "Yes" vote in the referendum harder to achieve. Secret minutes on the EEAS negotiations recognise the need "to remain cautious in presenting these issues" ahead of the second Irish vote.
Post a Comment