Saturday 8 November 2008

A question for the council from Mr Anthony D Jones


Mr Jones has requested that I publish this as confirmation that the question does not mysteriously go ‘missing’ or was ‘never received’ as has previously happened.
Tameside Citizen

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

U know Jones, if ur lot ever got into power u would be one of the first into the chambers

tonydj said...

Why should I want to be a barrister or judge?....... Oh you mean the Gas Chambers.

And your reasoning behind your assertion is?

Anonymous said...

Labour till i die - This is not the first time you have made threatening remarks on this blog.


Remember, everybody has their own unique style of writing, and the more you try to conceal your own style the more you reveal yourself.

GMP.

Anonymous said...

New membership figures for the bnp show big decrease in may areas including the north west and big problems with finances, unless they can get a huge increase in funds we are told most areas in the European elections will be starved of cash, now this is a big shock to us we have been told that 90% of their existing funds will be spent in the north west guess who top of their list, yes it Nick you lot must cough up more he needs your cash to waste on this election.

Anonymous said...

Labour till i die and Labour insider are the same person according to our expert.

And we know which person.

GMP

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
tonydj said...

the question was not asked by the panel!

It was claimed that the matter had already been dealt with by the officers under a FoI REQUEST.

I was not asking details of whether the council carried out the alleged activities, they have denied it and I am prepared to believe them.

The question is, since the Government website still claims that the council DID interfere with the local press will the council contact the Government department and demand it's removal?

They HAVE contacted local blogs to remove photos and personal articles on local council employees in the past, why not in THIS case??